摘要
在全球化高速发展的实践背景下,在国际学术界对于全球化问题进行了多方面的分析和阐述之时,中国国际法学者对于全球化的现象、影响,尤其是全球化带来的国际法结构、主体、进程、价值变革等法律问题进行了研讨。这些研讨一方面拓展了国际法的视野,另一方面也存在宏观判断不足、独立思考欠缺的短板。随着全球化在实践之中碰到越来越多的阻碍,逆全球化成为国际社会不可逃避、不容忽视的现象。这就需要在观念上认清理论的内涵与边界,廓清对理论的迷茫和误解,提升学术理论界的理论自觉与学术努力。如果能够充分利用中国独特的实践资源激发理论创新,提升对全球化各层次表现与规律的理论自觉,促进对全球化各层次的问题进行反思性探索,则不仅中国国际法学界的理论发展会有更充实、扎实的学术成果,而且也能够凸显中国作为负责任大国对国际法的未来所进行的深度思考、价值引领、观念提升等积极的作用。
In recent years,the U.S.trade policies and legal strategies have undergone significant changes due to the shifting distribution of trade gains at both international and domestic levels.Due to the different responses to the changing interests of these two levels,from Obama to Trump,and then to the current Biden administration,the United States has one after another taken"neoliberal","aggressive protectionism"and"re-embeded liberalism"trade policies,as well as the coresponding legal strategies of"rule upgrading""rule revision"and"rule restructuring"Although the three U.S.administrations adopted different trade policies and legal strategies,their implementation was first and foremost targeting China.Undoubtedly,clarifying the appearances and mechanisms of the recent changes in U.S.trade policies and legal strategies is a prerequisite for further discussion of China's way to deal with them.
出处
《中国法律评论》
2023年第2期116-142,共27页
China Law Review
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“坚持统筹推进国内法治与涉外法治研究”(2022JZDZ005)的阶段性成果。
关键词
全球化
逆全球化
再全球化
理论反思
Sino-US Trade Relations:U.S.Trade Policy
Trade Rules
Trade Law