期刊文献+

总体焦虑、抑郁水平与损害程度量表中文简版修订 被引量:1

Reliability and Validity of Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale and Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale:A Chinese Simplified Version
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:修订总体焦虑水平与损害程度量表(Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale,OASIS)中文简版、总体抑郁水平与损害程度量表(Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale,ODSIS)中文简版,检验其在中国被试中的信度和效度。方法:采用方便取样法,对385名被试进行初测,随后进行项目分析、验证性因素分析(CFA)。6周后对愿意参与重测的106名被试进行重测,以检验重测信度。结果:修订后的OASIS、ODSIS中文简版保留了原问卷的单因素结构。OASIS内部一致性系数为0.81,重测信度为0.64(P<0.01);ODSIS内部一致性系数为0.89,重测信度为0.58(P<0.01)。OASIS与特质焦虑、状态焦虑、社交焦虑、贝克抑郁量表、冲动性、大学生焦虑敏感性、神经质、自我报告症状水平得分显著正相关,与心理韧性、宜人性得分显著负相关,与开放性相关不显著。而ODSIS与贝克抑郁量表、行为抑制、神经质、自我报告症状水平、流调中心用抑郁量表、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表、9项目患者健康量表的得分显著正相关,与行为激活、宜人性显著负相关。结论:OASIS与ODSIS在一般人群中具有良好的信度和效度。 Objective:To revise the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale(OASIS)and Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale(ODSIS)into a Chinese simplified version and to examine their reliability and validity among Chinese participants.Methods:A sample of 385 Chinese participants were recruited through convenience sampling,then the initial results of OASIS and ODSIS were put into item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to examine scale structure.106 willing participants went through re-test 6 weeks later to examine test-retest reliability.The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3,Beck Depression Inventory-II,Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th version,Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale,Symptom Check-List 90,Social Phobia Inventory,State-Trait Anxiety Inventory,Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventory,Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System Scale,Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale,Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale and Patient Health Questionaire-9 were selected as criterion-related indicators.Results:The 5-item OASIS and ODSIS contained one dimension,which was consistent with previous findings.Results of CFA supported the one-dimension model of OASIS and the one-dimension model of ODSIS.Cronbach’sαcoefficient for OASIS and ODSIS were 0.81,0.89;and the test-retest reliability were 0.64,0.58(bothP s<0.01).OASIS was negatively correlated with CD-RISC and agreeableness,and positively correlated with STAI,SPIN,BDI-II,ASI-3,Neuroticism and SCL-90.ODSIS was negatively correlated with BAS and agreeableness,and positively correlated with BDI-II,BIS,Neuroticism,SCL-90,CES-D,DASS and PHQ-9.Conclusion:The Chinese simplified version of OASIS and ODSIS have good reliability and validity among Chinese general population.
作者 刘竹 贺梦瑶 王楠 刘兴华 LIU Zhu;HE Meng-yao;WANG Nan;LIU Xing-hua(Center of Psychological Health Education and Counselling,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400030,China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health,School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期353-359,共7页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 总体焦虑 总体抑郁 简版 信度 效度 Overall anxiety Overall depression Simplified version Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献90

  • 1李飞,苏林雁,耿耀国.Barratt冲动量表用于儿童的信度和效度初步研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(2):115-117. 被引量:32
  • 2周亮,肖水源,何晓燕,厉洁,刘慧铭.BIS-11中文版的信度与效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):343-344. 被引量:98
  • 3杨会芹,姚树桥,朱熊兆,Randy P. Auerbach,John R. Z. Abela,XI Tong.Barratt冲动量表中文版用于中学生的信度、效度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):4-6. 被引量:34
  • 4汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 5王征宇.症状自评量表(SCL-90)[J].上海精神医学,1984,4(2):67-68.
  • 6金华 吴文源.中国正常人SCL-90评定结果的初步分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12(5):68-70.
  • 7李献云,费立鹏.自杀和自杀干预的研究方法[M]∥王声滂,林汉生.伤害流行病学现场研究方法.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:145-211.
  • 8马弘.状态-特质焦虑问卷.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:238-241.
  • 9Costa PT, MeCrae RR. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,1985.
  • 10Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual suppiement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.

共引文献921

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部