父母阅读信念量表在中国学前儿童父母中的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of the Parent Reading Belief Inventory in Chinese Preschool Children’s Parents

目的:检验中文版父母阅读信念量表在中国学前儿童父母中的信度和效度。方法:随机抽取上海公立幼儿园1112名儿童的父母,由父亲或母亲完成父母阅读信念量表。其中部分父母完成家庭读写环境问卷,1个月后完成父母阅读信念量表重测。5个月后通过儿童阅读兴趣问卷和亲子阅读视频完成儿童阅读兴趣测评。结果:验证性因素分析显示二阶七因素模型拟合良好(χ^(2)/df=2.82,P<0.001,RMSEA=0.04,CFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.94,SRMR=0.04)。7个因子与家庭阅读环境的相关系数在0.23—0.49之间,与儿童阅读兴趣的相关系数在0.22—0.47之间。总量表及各因素的内部一致性信度(0.80—0.96)和重测信度(0.74—0.95)良好。多群组验证性因素分析结果显示中文版父母阅读信念量表在父亲、母亲间具有完全的测量等值性。结论:中文版父母阅读信念量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评定中国学前儿童父母阅读信念的工具。

Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Parent Reading Belief Inventory(PRBI)among the parents of Chinese preschool children.Methods:Parents of 1112 children in Shanghai public kindergartens were randomly selected.All parents completed PRBI,some parents completed the Home Literacy Environment Questionnaire,and one month later,some parents accomplished PRBI,and five months later,some parents fulfilled the Children Reading Interest Questionnaire and took parent-child reading videos to assess children reading interest.Results:Confirmatory factor analysis show that the second-order seven factors model fited well(χ^(2)/df=2.82,P<0.001,RMSEA=0.04,CFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.94,SRMR=0.04),and the correlation coefficients of the seven factors with the home literacy environment and children’s reading interest were between 0.23-0.49 and 0.22-0.47 respectively.The internal consistency reliability(0.80-0.96)and test-retest reliability(0.74-0.95)of the total scale and each subscale were good.The results of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Chinese version of PRBI had entire measurement equivalence between father and mother.Conclusion:The Chinese version PRBI has good reliability and validity,and can be used as a tool to evaluate the parents’reading beliefs of Chinese preschool children.