期刊文献+

积极独处量表在中国大学生中的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of the Positive Solitude Scale in Chinese College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:检验积极独处量表(positive solitude scale,PS)在中国大学生中的信度和效度。方法:采用积极独处量表中文版、广泛性焦虑量表、正性负性情绪量表和生活满意度量表对1472名大学生施测。结果:①积极独处量表中文版的9个项目区分度良好;②探索性因素分析得到1个公因子,累积方差贡献率为43.522%;③验证性因素分析显示,单因子结构模型拟合良好(RMSEA=0.066,CFI=0.957,TLI=0.943,SRMR=0.033);④积极独处量表中文版的Cronbach’sα系数为0.845,重测信度为0.906;⑤积极独处与焦虑和负性情绪呈显著负相关,与正性情绪和生活满意度呈显著正相关。结论:积极独处量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可作为我国大学生积极独处的测量工具。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Positive Solitude Scale(PS)in Chinese college students.Methods:1472 college students were tested with Chinese version of Positive Solitude Scale,Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale(GAD-7),Positive and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS),and the Satisfaction With Life Scale(SWLS).Results:①The differentiation of 9 items in Chinese version of Positive Solitude Scale was good;②A common factor was obtained by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 43.522%;③Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the single factor structure model fit well(RMSEA=0.066,CFI=0.957,TLI=0.943,SRMR=0.033);④The Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the Chinese version of Positive Solitude Scale was 0.845,and the test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of Positive Solitude Scale was 0.906;⑤Positive solitude was significantly negatively correlated with anxiety and negative affect,and positively correlated with positive affect and life satisfaction.Conclusion:The Chinese version of Positive Solitude Scale had good reliability and validity,and could be used to measure positive solitude of Chinese college students.
作者 虞芷筠 杨强 叶宝娟 黄达武 刘露 YU Zhi-jun;YANG Qiang;YE Bao-juan;HUANG Da-wu;LIU Lu(School of Psychology,School of Education,Research Center of Mental Health Education,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China;Physical Education College,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期384-387,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(72164018) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(22YJA190012) 江西省社科规划课题(21JY13) 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ200306,GJJ191698) 江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地课题(JD20068)。
关键词 积极独处 大学生 信度 效度 心理健康 Positive solitude College students Reliability Validity Mental health
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献84

  • 1梁德清.高校学生应激水平及其与体育锻炼的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1994,8(1):5-6. 被引量:565
  • 2教育部《大学生心理健康测评系统》课题组,郑日昌,邓丽芳,张忠华,郭召良.《中国大学生心理健康量表》的编制[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):102-108. 被引量:181
  • 3聂衍刚,蔡笑岳,张卫.初一学生人格特征、学习适应性与学习成绩关系的研究[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):134-138. 被引量:25
  • 4[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 5[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 6[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 7[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 8[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 9[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 10[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162

共引文献2404

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部