期刊文献+

在线风险暴露量表在中国大学生中的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of the Online Risk Exposure Scale in Chinese College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:基于中国大学生群体考察在线风险暴露量表的信效度。方法:两次共招募1235名大学生,其中第一次招募541名,只作答在线风险暴露量表,第二次招募694名,依次填写在线风险暴露量表、焦虑量表、抑郁量表和社交媒体成瘾量表。1个月后从第二批被试中选取86人进行重测。结果:在线风险暴露量表各条目区分度良好。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析(χ^(2)/df=4.65,RMSEA=0.073,TLI=0.923,CFI=0.939,IFI=0.939,NFI=0.923)均支持了四因子结构,累计方差贡献率为66.07%。总量表的Cronbach’sα系数和重测信度分别为0.91和0.66。在线风险暴露与焦虑(r=0.49,P<0.01)、抑郁(r=0.46,P<0.01)和社交媒体成瘾(r=0.26,P<0.01)均存在显著正相关。结论:在线风险暴露量表中文版符合测量学标准,可用于测量大学生的在线风险暴露水平。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Online Risk Exposure Scale(ORES)in Chinese college students.Methods:1235 Chinese college students participated in this study.541 participants were asked to complete the ORES for the first time.In the second test,694 participants filled in the ORES,Anxiety Scale,Depression Scale,and Social Media Addiction Scale.A month after the second survey,86 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of ORES.Results:Each item of the ORES had a good discrimination.Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four-factor model of the scale(χ^(2)/df=4.65,RMSEA=0.073,TLI=0.923,CFI=0.939,IFI=0.939,NFI=0.923).The cumulative explained variance was 66.07%.The internal consistency reliability coefficient and test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale were 0.91 and 0.66 respectively.The total score of the ORES was positively correlated with anxiety(r=0.49,P<0.01),depression(r=0.46,P<0.01)and social media addiction(r=0.26,P<0.01).Conclusion:The Chinese version of ORES meets the measurement standards and could be used to measure the online risk exposure of college students.
作者 张亚利 刘潇濛 张英杰 马雪玉 张建根 王湃 ZHANG Ya-li;LIU Xiao-meng;ZHANG Ying-jie;MA Xue-yu;ZHANG Jian-gen;WANG Pai(School of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China;Cangzhou Preschool Teachers College,Cangzhou 062150,China;School of Teacher Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China;Education Science Teaching Department,Xingtai University,Xingtai 054001,China;Finance Department of Hebei Province,Shijiazhuang 050051,China;School of Education Science,Tonghua Normal University,Tonghua134000,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期392-395,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 河北师范大学校内人文社会科学研究基金项目(S22B018) 吉林省教育厅“十三五”社会科学研究重点项目(JJH20191100SK) 河北省教育厅人文社科项目(SQ2023237)。
关键词 在线风险暴露 信度 效度 大学生 Online risk exposure Reliability Validity College students
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献101

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3516
  • 2赵红梅,苏彦捷.被同伴拒绝个体的心理理解[J].中国特殊教育,2005(6):74-78. 被引量:1
  • 3[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 4[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 5[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 6[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 7[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 8[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 9[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 10[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993

共引文献1352

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部