期刊文献+

广州车牌分配模式的效率和公平分析

An Analysis of Efficiency and Equity of the Car Plates Allocation Mechanism in Guangzhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文分析了广州车牌配置结果的效率和公平以及博士和博士后人才补贴对车牌配置结果的影响。首先分析了广州车牌分配博弈的均衡:由于参与人只能选择一种方式获得车牌,均衡中对车牌支付意愿高的人参加拍卖,对车牌支付意愿低的人参加摇号。其次,根据车牌分配数据估计表明,消费者剩余和拍卖收入约为5∶1,车牌可得性机会分布的基尼系数为0.42。最后,人才补贴会提高车牌拍卖的价格,减少拍卖净收入,对车牌分配结果的效率和公平的影响不定,依赖具有补贴资格参与者的分布情况。 Guangzhou city is the first city to use the auction and lottery hybrid mechanism to allocate the car plates in traffic restriction cities. The efficiency and equity of allocation and the effects of talent subsidy are analyzed. Firstly, the Nash equilibrium of the game under Guangzhou Mechanism is analyzed and the willingness to pay for the car plates of auction participants are higher than the willingness to pay of the lottery participants. Secondly, after estimating the tail distribution of the participants’ willingness to pay, we find that the ratio of the consumer surplus to the revenue is about 5∶1, and the Gini coefficient of car plate accessibility is 0.42. Thirdly, we find that the talent subsidy may increase the bidding price and decrease the revenue from the car plate auction. The effect of talent subsidy on the efficiency and equity of allocation depends on the distribution of the willingness to pay of qualified participants of the talent subsidy.
作者 聂海峰 Haifeng Nie(Lingnan College,Sun Yat-sen University)
出处 《经济学报》 2023年第1期260-279,共20页 China Journal of Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“增强消费对经济发展的基础性作用研究”(项目编号:21ZDA036) 广东省自然科学基金重点项目(2018B030311053)的资助。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献47

  • 1王平平,孙绍荣.车辆牌照拍卖模型[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):75-78. 被引量:6
  • 2程琳,王炜.拥堵交通网络模型和增强拉格朗日乘子算法[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(5):18-27. 被引量:16
  • 3Benoit J P, Krishna V. Multiple-object auctions with budget constrained bidders [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2001,68(1) :155-179.
  • 4Che Y K, Gale I. Standard auctions with financially constrained bidders[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65(1): 1-21.
  • 5Che Y K, Gale I. The optimal mechanism for selling to a budget-constrained buyer[J]. Journal of Econo- mic Theory, 2000, 92(2): 198-233.
  • 6Che Y K, Gale I, Kim J. Assigning resources to budget-constrained agents[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2013, 80(1): 73-107.
  • 7Chen X, Zhao J. Bidding to drive: Vehicle license auction policy in Shanghai and its public acceptance[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 27: 39-52.
  • 8Chu S F, Winston T, Koh H, et al. Expectations formation and forecasting of vehicle demand: An empi- rical study of the vehicle quota auctions in Singapore[J]. Transportation Research Part A.. Policy and Prac- tice, 2004, 38(5): 367-381.
  • 9Condorelli D. Market and non-market mechanisms for the optimal allocation of scarce resources[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2013, 82: 582-591.
  • 10Evans M, Vossler C, Flores N. Hybrid allocation mechanism for publicly provided goods[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2009, 93(1): 311-325.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部