期刊文献+

深度肌松对乳腺癌改良根治术后疼痛影响分析

The effect of deep muscle relaxation on pain after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察深度肌松对乳腺癌改良根治术后疼痛的影响。方法选择潍坊医学院附属医院于2021年10月~2022年12月接收的乳腺癌根治术治疗的女性患者80例,随机分为观察组(深肌松PTC≤2)和对照组(浅肌松TOF=4)。应用视觉疼痛模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者术后疼痛程度,检测患者术前及术后血清IL-6及BK的水平。结果观察组术后VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后IL-6、BK水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论深度肌松应用于乳腺癌改良根治术麻醉效果较好,可显著减轻患者术后疼痛。 Objective To observe the effect of deep muscle relaxation on pain after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Methods A total of 80 female patients treated with radical mastectomy for breast cancer from October 2021 to December 2022 were chosen in the Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University and randomly divided them into two groups.The operation was done under deep muscle relaxation(post-tetanic count stimulation,PTC≤2)in the observation group,while the operation was done under superficial muscle relaxation(train of four stimulation,TOF=4)in the control group.Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)was used to score the degree of pain and to test the serum levels of IL-6 and BK before and after the surgery.Results The postoperative VAS score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The postoperative IL-6 and BK levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Deep muscle relaxation which is used in the modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer has better anesthetic effect and it can significantly reduce the postoperative pain for the patients.
作者 谢长江 卢克良 XIE Changjiang;LU Keliang(School of Anesthesiology,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261053,China)
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2023年第1期24-26,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 深度肌松 乳腺癌改良根治术 疼痛 白细胞介素-6 缓激肽 Deep muscle relaxation Modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer Pain Human interleukin-6 Bradykinin
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1ZollingerRM著 徐荣楠译.外科手术图谱(第1版)[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1991.412.
  • 2Artz PA.Management of Surgical Complications[M].3 ed.WB Saunders Company,1975.673.
  • 3RstichKHBauer 邝公道译.外科手术时的错误及其危险(第1版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1960.230.
  • 4Woodforde JM,Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain[J].{H}Journal of Psychosomatic Research,1972,(03):173-178.
  • 5Jensen MP,Chen C,Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores:a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain[J].{H}Journal of Pain,2003,(07):407-414.
  • 6Gallagher E J,Liebman M,Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):633-638.
  • 7Gallagher E J,Bijur PE,Latimer C. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2002,(04):287-290.
  • 8Fosnocht DE,Chapman CR,Swanson ER. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2005,(01):55-59.
  • 9Grilo RM,Treves R,Preux PM. Clinically relevant VAS pain score change in patients with acute rheumatic conditions[J].{H}Joint Bone Spine:Revue du Rhumatisme,2007,(04):358-361.
  • 10Bird SB,Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):639-643.

共引文献807

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部