期刊文献+

中重度宫腔粘连术后患者妊娠失败的影响因素

Influencing factors of pregnancy failure in patients after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions surgeries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析中重度宫腔粘连术后患者妊娠失败的影响因素。方法:回顾性分析2018年3月至2021年3月37例中重度宫腔粘连术后妊娠失败患者的临床资料,设为失败组。另选取同期37例中重度宫腔粘连术后妊娠成功患者,设为成功组。比较两组临床资料,采用多因素Logistic回归分析中重度宫腔粘连术后患者妊娠失败的影响因素。结果:失败组重度宫腔粘连占比、月经未恢复正常占比、体质量指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m^(2)占比和术后再粘连占比高于成功组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组年龄、病程、手术时间、使用防粘连装置情况、手术方式和宫腔操作次数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,重度宫腔粘连、月经未恢复正常、BMI≥30 kg/m^(2)和术后再粘连均为中重度宫腔粘连术后患者妊娠失败的独立危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05)。结论:重度宫腔粘连、月经未恢复正常、BMI≥30 kg/m^(2)和术后再粘连均为中重度宫腔粘连术后患者妊娠失败的独立危险因素。 Objective:To analyze influencing factors of pregnancy failure in patients after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions surgeries.Methods:The clinical data of 37 patients with pregnancy failure after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion surgeries admitted to this hospital from March 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed,and they set as failure group.The clinical data of 37 patients with successful pregnancy after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion surgeries were retrospectively analyzed,and they set as successful group.The clinical data of the two groups were compared.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of pregnancy failure in the patients after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions surgeries.Results:The proportion of severe intrauterine adhesions,the proportion of not returning to normal menstruation,the proportion of body mass index(BMI)≥30 kg/m^(2) and the proportion of postoperative re-adhesion in the failure group were higher than those in the successful group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age,course of disease,surgical time,use of anti-adhesion devices,surgical method,and frequency of uterine cavity operations(P>0.05).The Logistic regression analysis showed that severe intrauterine adhesions,abnormal menstruation,BMI≥30 kg/m^(2),and postoperative re-adhesions were independent risk factors for the pregnancy failure in the patients after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions surgeries(OR>1,P<0.05).Conclusions:Severe intrauterine adhesions,abnormal menstruation,BMI≥30 kg/m^(2),and postoperative readhesions are the independent risk factors for the pregnancy failure in the patients after moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions surgeries.
作者 孙艳霞 SUN Yanxia(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Zhengzhou Daqiao Hospital,Zhengzhou 450000 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2023年第7期14-16,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 宫腔粘连术 妊娠失败 影响因素 月经 体质量指数 术后再粘连 宫腔粘连程度 多因素LOGISTIC回归分析 Intrauterine adhesion surgery Pregnancy failure Influencing factor Menstruation Body mass index Postoperative readhesion Intrauterine adhesion degree Multivariate Logistic regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献184

  • 1罗小雨,彭菊兰,吴璇华.TGF-β和TIMP-1在宫腔粘连患者血清中的表达[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,35(10):1143-1145. 被引量:12
  • 2成九梅,夏恩兰,段华.宫腔镜治疗结核引起的重度宫腔粘连14例分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(2):148-150. 被引量:19
  • 3夏良斌,李爱斌,杨菁,胡静,李明.宫腔镜术后宫腔持续放置球囊导尿管治疗重度宫腔粘连312例疗效分析[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(16):1870-1872. 被引量:42
  • 4Rein DT, Schmidt T, Hess AP, et al. Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011,18(6):774-778.
  • 5Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, et al. Asherman syndrome: one century later[J]. Fertil Steril,2008,89(4):759-779.
  • 6Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, et al. Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman' s syndrome[J]. Fertil Steril,2008,89(3):715-722.
  • 7Roy KK, Baruah J, Sharma JB, et al. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman' s syndrome[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2010,281 (2):355-361.
  • 8AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of intrauterine synechiae[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2010,17(1): 1-7.
  • 9Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care[J]. CMAJ,2003,169(3):207-208.
  • 10Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process[J]. Am J Prey Med,2001,20(3 Suppl):21-35.

共引文献865

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部