“书”类文献的政治哲学新解读--从葛觉智《中国早期政治合法性的调解》谈起

A New Interpretation of Shu-type Texts from the Perspective of Political Philosophy:An Instance of Grebnev's Mediation of Legitimacy in Early China

在《中国早期政治合法性的调解》一书中,葛觉智(Yegor Grebnev)揭示了对《逸周书》等早期中国文献的最新研究成果,呈现了以其为代表的海外学者,从文化记忆理论出发对《逸周书》的成书过程、文本分类、内容分析、思想来源等全方面研究的过程。结合传世与新出“书”类和太公文献,通过多学科综合分析和知识史学的视角,重新认识《逸周书》的成书过程和文本来源。在逐层分析不同的篇章和阐释不同文献之间关系的过程中,挖掘《逸周书》主体文本和道家文本之间的关联,认为《逸周书》文本呈现了不同时代的政治权威和众多学派的知识体系。

In the book Mediation of Legitimacy in Early China:A Study of the Yizhoushu and the Grand Duke Traditions,Yegor Grebnev reveals the latest research results on early Chinese literature such as the Yizhoushu.The work reflects the research process of overseas scholars,represented by Grebnev,from the perspective of cultural memory theory with regards to all aspects of the book formation process,text classification,content analysis,and ideological sources of the Yizhoushu.Combined with handed down and newly unearthed Shu书-type texts and the"Taigong太公"documents,and through multidisciplinary comprehensive analysis and the perspective of historical theories of knowledge,we can reassess the compilation process and textual source of the Yizhoushu.In the process of the layer-by-layer-analysis of different chapters and the interpretation of the relationship between different documents,mining the relationship between the main text of the Yizhoushu and Daoist texts,it is believed that the text of the Yizhoushu presents us with political authorities of different time periods and the knowledge systems of many schools.