对“不可放弃的权利”三个批判性命题的回应

A Response to Three Critical Propositions on Inalienable Right

为捍卫权利选择论的解释力,选择论理论家提出不可能定理、道德优先命题和权利冗余论,否定存在不可放弃的权利。然而,不可能定理混淆了权力和特权,突破了基本法律关系;道德优先命题因拒绝承认权利的“门槛”,从权利的重要性导向权利的绝对性;权利冗余论忽视权利的“分量加重效果”。因此,选择论理论家的攻击并不成立。

To defend the explanatory power of the right selection theory,selection theorists put forward the impossibility theorem,the proposition of moral priority,and the redundancy theory of rights to deny the existence of inalienable rights.However,the impossibility theorem confuses power and privilege and breaks through basic legal relationships;The proposition of moral priority shifts from the importance of rights to the absoluteness of rights by refusing to recognize the“threshold”of rights;The redundancy theory of rights ignores the“weight-aggravating effect”of rights.Therefore,the attack of selection theorists is groundless.