全球风险治理视域下中国道德话语重构的三大命题

Three Propositions on the Reconstruction of Chinese Moral Discourse from the Perspective of Global Risk Governance

作为一种地方性道德知识的中国道德话语只有转移为普遍性道德话语,才能获得参与全球风险治理的能力。转移即重构,其中包含三个内在相关的基本命题:空间场域、价值逻辑与叙事进路。全球化时代的“地方”概念突破了地理空间与文化空间的双重疆界,推动地方性道德知识所构造的空间场域实现了从地方到全球的转向,由此获得了转移为普遍性道德话语的可能性。也正是在此种意义上,中国道德话语与全球风险治理发生了交集。文明交流互鉴逻辑与文明同质化逻辑的分歧,从本质上反映了多元现代性与一元现代性的观念之争。前者突破了后者在共同利益、文化交往、责任担当等方面所存在的多重认知局限,成为中国道德话语重构的内在遵循。此种价值逻辑深刻地影响着中国道德话语重构的叙事进路,而叙事文本在“传统”与“现代”之间的联结方式则成为问题的中心。与“直接转进”和“间接转进”相异的是,“创造性转化和创新性发展”将中国传统道德话语融入马克思主义道德话语,并以后者作为参与全球风险治理的中国文化资源,由此全面而客观地注解了“中国”场域中现代道德话语的意涵。

Chinese moral discourse as a local moral knowledge can only obtain the ability to participate in global risk governance if it is transferred to a universal moral discourse.Transfer also means reconstruction,which contains three intrinsically related fundamental propositions:spatial field,value logic and narrative progression.The concept of“place”in the era of globalization has broken through the dual boundaries of geographical space and cultural space,and promoted the spatial field of local moral knowledge to shift from local to global.As a result,Chinese moral discourse has gained the possibility of being transferred to universal moral discourse.It is also in this sense that Chinese moral discourse intersects with global risk governance.The divergence between the logic of exchanges and mutual learning of civilizations and the logic of homogenization of civilizations essentially reflects the contention between the concepts of pluralistic modernity and unitary modernity.The former breaks through the latter’s multiple cognitive limitations in terms of common interests,cultural interactions,and responsibilities,and becomes an inherent compliance for the reconstruction of Chinese moral discourse.This value logic profoundly influences the narrative progression of the reconstruction of Chinese moral discourse,and the way in which the narrative text is linked between“tradition”and“modernity”becomes the center of the issue.In contrast to“direct transfer”and“indirect transfer”,“innovative transformation and development”integrates traditional Chinese moral discourse into Marxist moral discourse and uses the latter as a Chinese cultural resource to participate in global risk governance.In this way,the meaning of modern moral discourse in the field of“China”can be comprehensively and objectively interpreted.