期刊文献+

成本分担契约对企业减排决策的影响研究

Study on the Impact of Cost-sharing Contracts on Emission Reduction Decisions of Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为促进汽车产业企业间的合作减排,研究成本分担契约下由供应商、制造商、销售商构成的汽车产业企业的减排决策问题。将制造商作为博弈主方,将供应商、销售商作为博弈从方,构建三方合作行为决策动态演化模型,分析三方参与的演化路径与产业整体稳定策略,并结合仿真模拟分析影响三方对遵守契约意愿的因素。研究表明:随着三方合作初始意愿的增加,汽车产业整体达到平衡的速度也越快;当制造商适当降低其承担的减排成本时,三方仍表现出守约意愿,但过大地降低其承担的减排成本时会使供应商、销售商选择违约。 In order to promote the cooperative emission reduction among enterprises in the automotive industry,the problem of emission reduction decision of enterprises in the automotive industry consisting of suppliers,manufacturers and sellers under the cost-sharing contract is studied.In this paper,the manufacturer is taken as the main party of the game,the supplier and the seller are taken as the followers of the game,and the dynamic evolution model of the tripartite cooperative behavior decision is constructed.The evolutionary path of the participation of the three parties and the overall stability strategy of the industry are analyzed.The factors affecting the willingness of the three parties to comply with the contract are analyzed with simulation.The study shows that:as the initial willingness of the three parties to cooperate increases,the speed of reaching equilibrium increases;when the manufacturer appropriately reduces its share of abatement costs,the three parties still show willingness to comply with the contract,but when they reduce their share of abatement costs too much,the suppliers and sellers choose to breach the contract.
作者 潘文砚 朱雅姿 王玲玲 PAN Wenyan;ZHU Yazi;WANG Lingling
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版)》 2023年第2期246-251,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information & Management Engineering
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(21YJC630104) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(72172112) 国家大学生创新创业训练项目(S202210497007)。
关键词 减排决策 成本分担契约 演化博弈 汽车产业 合作减排 仿真模拟 emission reduction decisions cost sharing contract evolutionary game automotive industry cooperative emission reduction simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献75

  • 1王锐兰.航空公司价格竞争的博弈解释[J].技术经济与管理研究,2004(3):81-82. 被引量:7
  • 2赵道致,王楚格.考虑低碳政策的供应链企业减排决策研究[J].工业工程,2014,17(1):105-111. 被引量:19
  • 3牟德一,李琴.单航线双寡头下的航空公司定价决策[J].管理观察,2008(4):155-156. 被引量:6
  • 4Ellerman D,Buchner B. The European Union emissionstrading scheme: Origins, allocation,and early results[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,2007,1(1): 66-87.
  • 5Stavins R N. Addressing climate change with a compre-hensive US cap-and-trade system [J] Oxford Review ofEconomic Policy, 2008,24(2) : 298 - 321.
  • 6Wang Fan. A multi-objective optimization for green sup-ply chain network design[J],Decision Support Systems2011,(51) :262-269.
  • 7Laroche M,Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G. Targetingconsumers who are willing to pay more for environmen-tally-friendly products[J]. Journal of Consumer Market-ing, 2001,18(6): 503-520.
  • 8Liu Zugang. Consumer environmental awareness andcompetition in two-stage supply chains [ J ]. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research,2012,(218): 602 -613.
  • 9Plambeck E L. Reducing greenhouse gas emissionsthrough operations and supply chain management [J].Energy Economics, 2012 , 34(S1) : S64 -S74.
  • 10Tietenberg T H,Cui Weiguo. Emissions trading: Re-form on pollution control policy [ M]. Beijing: Beijing.

共引文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部