期刊文献+

短视频著作权司法保护研究 被引量:18

Research on Judicial Protection of Short-video Copyright
下载PDF
导出
摘要 短视频行业的迅速发展引发了一系列著作权侵权纠纷,给司法实践带来了诸多难题和挑战。短视频的表达存在可识别的差异性,即可认定其具有独创性,并可以按照署名、其他初步证据、确定发表账号运营主体的方法和步骤认定其著作权归属。二次创作短视频具有构成合理使用的可能性,须结合“三步检验法”三个要件进行逐一界定。短视频平台责任的认定应当从“明知、应知”和“必要措施”两方面予以考察,但现阶段并不具备从立法上设定事先审查和过滤义务的条件。短视频著作权纠纷的解决应重在预防,需要司法及行政机关、集体管理组织、长短视频平台、短视频创作者等有关主体共同参与,形成系统性解决路径,促进短视频行业健康有序发展。 The rapid development of short-video industry has triggered a lot of copyright infringement disputes,which has presented plenty of problems and challenges to judicial practice.The short-video with an expression of identifiable differences can be identified as original,and its copyright ownership can be determined according to the attribution,other preliminary evidence,or the operating entity of the publishing account respectively and sequentially.The secondary creation of short-videos can be a fair use,which needs to be examined step by step in combination with the three requirements of the"three-step test".The liability of short-video platforms should be investigated from the two aspects of"knowing or should have known"and"necessary measures".However,at the present stage,there is no legislative condition to set the obligation of prior review and filtering on the platforms.The resolution of short-video copyright disputes should focus on the prevention,which requires the participation of the judicial and administrative authorities,collective management organizations,long-video and short-video platforms,and short-video creators,among others,so as to find a comprehensive problem-solving method and promote the healthy and orderly development of short-video industry.
作者 北京互联网法院课题组 张倩 李珂 李明檑 Beijing Internet Court Research Group
出处 《知识产权》 北大核心 2023年第3期3-29,共27页 Intellectual Property
关键词 短视频 著作权 二次创作 合理使用 平台责任 司法保护 short-video copyright secondary creation fair use platform liability judicial protection
  • 相关文献

共引文献548

引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部