元曲接受史的文化阐释与理论构造--美国学者夏颂的学术研究述评
Cultural Interpretation and Theoretical Construction of the Reception History of Yuanqu:Comments on the Academic Research of Patricia Sieber from OSU
摘要
20世纪末,北美汉学界开始关注元杂剧的版本和明代接受情况的问题。著名汉学家伊维德(Wilt L.Idema)和奚如谷(Stephen H.West)在编纂《中国戏剧(1100-1450)资料英译类编》(Chinese Theater1100-1450:A Source Book)中注意到文本在传承中经历的各种形态以及由此引发的诠释问题。①伊维德和奚如谷接下来分别撰文讨论了《赵氏孤儿》和《窦娥冤》明代改写情况的两个个案。伊维德还撰文提出:“杂剧一旦被明代统治者改编为一种宫廷娱乐。”
出处
《戏曲研究》
2022年第3期355-370,共16页
Traditional Chinese Drama Research
二级参考文献87
-
1顾起元.《客座赘语》卷10《国初榜文》.王利器.《元明清三代禁毁小说戏曲史料》.上海古籍出版社,1981年.第14页.
-
2Tian Yuan Tan, "Prohibition of Jiatou Zaju in the Ming Dynasty and the Portrayal of the Emperor as Stage," Ming Studies ( Minneapolis, MN) no. 49 ( Spr. 2004 ), pp. 82 - 111.
-
3Fan Pen Chen," Forbidden Fruits:Prohibitions on the Performance of Female and Han Ethnic Identifies," CHINOPERL Papers ( Ann Arbor, MI) no. 25 ( 2003 - 2004), pp. 35 - 85.
-
4罗杰斯(Rogers.Everitt M),殷晓蓉译.《传播学史:一种传记式的方法》(The History of Communication Study:A Biographical Approach).上海译文出版社,2005年..
-
5Stephen H. West,"Text and Ideology:Ming Edition and Northern Drama",载华玮,王瑷玲编:《明清戏曲国际研讨会论文集》,台北“中央研究院”中国文哲研究所筹备处,1998年,第235-284页.
-
6Stephen H. West," Text and Ideology: Ming Edition and Northern Drama", Paul Jakov Smith and Richard yon Glalm, eds. , The Song - Yuan - Ming Transition in Chinese History. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Asia Cemer,2003, pp. 329 - 73.
-
7Wilt L. Idema,"Zang Maoxun as a Publisher. "in 磯部彰 ed.,《東ァジァ出版文化研究にゎたずみ》,东京:二玄社,2004,pp.19-29.
-
8"Educational Frustration, Shape - shifting Texts, and the Abiding Power of Antbologies :Three Versions of Wang Can Ascends the Tower," Early Medieval China( Kalamazoo, MI)10 - 11, pt. 2 (2005), pp. 145 -83.
-
9" The Many Shapes of Medieval Chinese Plays:How Texts Are Transformed to Meet the Needs of Actors, Spectators, Censors, and Readers, "Oral Tradition,20/2 (2005), pp. 320 - 34.
-
10"Li Kaixian ' s Revised Plays by Yuan Masters( Gaiding Yuanxian Chuanqi) and the Textual Transmission of Yuan Zaju as Seen in Two Plays by Ma Zhiyuan, "CHINOPERL Papers ( Ann Arbor, MI) no. 26 (2005 - 2006), pp. 47 -65.
共引文献49
-
1施爱东.大团圆何以成为元结局[J].民族艺术,2021(3):68-78. 被引量:10
-
2刘建欣.《元曲选》与元杂剧经典地位的形成[J].明清文学与文献,2022(1):137-153.
-
3焦中栋.杂剧《货郎旦》创作时间辩正——兼论北杂剧的早期创作[J].戏曲艺术,2003,24(2):41-45. 被引量:1
-
4汪晓云.丑角的沉浮[J].浙江艺术职业学院学报,2006,4(3):39-43. 被引量:1
-
5李作霖.文学史历史解释的合法性[J].中国文学研究,2007(1):20-23.
-
6解玉峰.论元曲杂剧之多重构成[J].文学评论,2008(2):114-120. 被引量:5
-
7戚世隽.明应王殿元代戏剧壁画新探[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2008,48(6):35-43. 被引量:4
-
8陈建华.失实与泥实:古典文学研究的两个常见误区——以苏力的《窦娥的悲剧》为例[J].晋阳学刊,2009(1):103-107. 被引量:1
-
9王家东.元刊本与明钞本《单刀会》杂剧之异同比较[J].忻州师范学院学报,2010,26(1):32-35.
-
10高子文.“戏剧情境”与“抒情”——元杂剧结构分析并就教于洛地先生[J].戏剧(中央戏剧学院学报),2012(1):59-66. 被引量:1
-
1ANDREW CHIN,XIAO FU(PHOTO).THE KIDS AREALRIGHT Hiperson leads the next generation of Maybe Mars art-rock[J].城市漫步(上海版、英文),2015(5):46-46.
-
2王志戈.国风玉雕文化阐释兼论其审美体现与传承创新[J].理财(经济),2023(5):5-7.
-
3林敏华.清初王铎书风影响的悖论[J].南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计),2023(2):74-79.
-
4STEPHEN CURRY 勇士国度[J].NBA特刊,2023(8):54-61.
-
5梁君健.赋象于声——论白云山节日影像志实践中的音乐议题[J].中国音乐,2023(1):193-199.
-
6萧梅.声影洞见——音乐影像志在当代[J].中国音乐,2023(1):129-137. 被引量:2
-
7黄华.论汤尼·白露的丁玲研究[J].名作欣赏(学术版)(下旬),2023(5):12-14. 被引量:1
-
8柴阿丽,杨红敏,李欣,石延霞,谢学文,李磊,范腾飞,李宝聚.内蒙古普通菜豆枯萎病病原菌鉴定[J].植物病理学报,2023,53(1):133-136.
-
9周志强.都市新民谣的听觉审美与文化阐释[J].新华文摘,2023(7):163-163.
-
10赵旭东,牛乐,高莉,杨富学.“词”与“物”的接受与变迁:关于热贡唐卡的学术对谈[J].西部文艺研究,2023(2):97-103.