期刊文献+

神经增强技术的现状、动因、风险与化解

The Present Situation,Motivation,Risks and Solutions of Neuroenhancement Technology
原文传递
导出
摘要 神经增强技术是当今生物医学与神经技术相结合的重要发展方向,是能够带来科技革命的新形式。推动神经增强技术发展的动力主要有医学需求、教育需求、军事需求、产学研的推动以及媒体宣传等多个因素。神经增强技术会导致各种伦理问题,其中最重要的就是如何应对神经增强技术带来的风险。神经增强技术的风险,既有神经增强技术运用于个体时产生的技术本身的风险,也有技术应用对社会层面的风险。若能在分析各种风险问题的基础上,评估风险、加强监管、进行对话,有针对性的寻求化解的方法,提供相应的对策,就能在实践层面平衡神经增强技术的利益与风险,符合人类美好生活与科技造福社会的目的。 Neuroenhancement technology is an important development direction of the combination of biomedicine and neurotechnology,which is a new form that can bring scientific and technological revolution.The motivation for the development of neuroenhancement technology is mainly medical demand,educational demand,military demand,the relation among industry and research,and media.Neuroenhancement technology also leads to various ethical problems.One of the most important issues is the risk of neuroenhancement.The risks of neuroenhancement technology include both the risks of the technology itself when the neuroenhancement technology is applied to the individual,and the risks of the application of the technology to the society.If we can estimate risks,strengthen supervision,organize dialogue,seek targeted solutions and provide corresponding countermeasures on the basis of analyzing various risk issues,we can balance the benefits and risks of neuroenhancement technology,which is the purpose of human's better life and the benefit of science and technology to society.
作者 马兰 MA Lan(School of Marxism,Jianghan University,Wuhan 430056,China)
出处 《系统科学学报》 北大核心 2023年第2期23-29,共7页 Chinese Journal of Systems Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目“人类增强技术的伦理问题与治理研究”(20YJAZH076) 湖北省教育厅人文社科基金项目“神经科学技术的伦理治理问题研究”(20G037) 国家社科基金重大项目“当代新兴增强技术前沿的人文主义哲学研究”(20&ZD044)。
关键词 神经增强 动因 风险 化解 neuroenhancement motivation risks solutions
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献50

  • 1文珺珺.关于“无形学院”[J].自然辩证法通讯,1987,9(2):33-41. 被引量:10
  • 2H.T.崽格尔哈特.生命伦理学基础[M].范瑞平.译,北京:北京大学出版社.2006:289.
  • 3克拉克·克尔.高等教育不能回避历史-21世纪的问题[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001.188.
  • 4Le Strange, R. A History of Herbal Plants[M]. London: Angus and Robertson, 1977, 8.
  • 5Sahakian, B., Morein-Zamir, S. 'Professor's Little Helper' [J]. Nature, 2007, 450: 1157-1159.
  • 6Greely, H., Sahakian, B., Harris, J., Kessler, R. C., Gazzaniga, M., Campbell, P., Farah, M. F. 'Commentary: towards Responsible Use of Cognitive-enhancing Drugs by the Healthy' [J]. Nature, 2008, 456: 702-705.
  • 7] Goodman, R. 'Cognitive Enhancement, Cheating, and Accomplishment' [J . Kennedy Inst Ethics Journal, 2010, 20(2): 145-160.
  • 8Bostrom, N., Sandberg, A. 'Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges' EJ]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2009, 15(3): 311-341.
  • 9Juengst, E. T. 'What does Enhancement Mean?' [A], Parens, E. (Eds) Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications FC], Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1998, 29.
  • 10Bostrom, N., Roache, R. 'Ethical Issues in Human Enhancement' [A], Ryberg, J. (Eds) New Waves in Applied Ethics [C], Michigan: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 2.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部