期刊文献+

心脏康复障碍量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:1

The Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS):translation and validation in cardiovascular patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 汉化心脏康复障碍量表并检验信效度。方法 根据Brislin翻译模型对心脏康复障碍量表进行翻译、文化调适和修订,并对260例心脏疾病患者进行调查,验证中文版心脏康复障碍量表的信效度。结果 中文版心脏康复障碍量表21个条目的临界比率值(CR)为3.120~8.251,高、低分组患者之间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。各维度与条目间相关系数0.504~0.866,各维度间相关系数0.405~0.768。量表总体Cronbach′s α系数0.920,4个维度Cronbach′s α系数为0.816~0.911;总量表重测信度为0.869,I-CVI为0.811~1.000,S-CVI/UA为0.841,S-CVI/Ave为0.940。共提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为64.701%。结论 中文版心脏康复障碍量表具有较好的信效度,可为心脏疾病患者康复护理方案制订和评估提供参考。 Objective To introduce and translate the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale(CRBS)into a Chinese version,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods In pursuant to Brislin translation model,CRBS was translated and back translated,culturally adjusted and revised,to form a Chinese version.A total of 260 patients with heart diseases were surveyed to verify the reliability and validity of the Chinese version.Results The critical ratio(CR)values of 21 items were between 3.120-8.251,with significant differences in all items between high-versus low-score groups(all P<0.05).Dimension-item correlation coefficients were between 0.504-0.866,and the dimension-dimension correlation coefficients were between 0.405-0.768.The Cronbach′sαcoefficient was 0.920 for the overall scale,and between 0.816-0.911 for the four dimensions;the test-retest coefficient was 0.869 for the whole scale.I-CVI was between 0.811-1.000,S-CVI/UA was 0.841,and S-CVI/Ave was 0.940.Four factors were extracted and collectively explained 64.701%of total variation.Conclusion The Chinese version CRBS has good reliability and validity.It can provide a basis for formulation of individual rehabilitation nursing plan and assessment for patients with heart diseases.
作者 端娟 赵继红 Duan Juan;Zhao Jihong(Department of Maternal and Child Cardiovascular Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Provincial People′s Hospital,Nanjing 210036,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第7期93-96,共4页 Journal of Nursing Science
关键词 心脏疾病 心脏康复 心脏康复障碍 康复护理 信度 效度 heart diseases cardiac rehabilitation cardiac rehabilitation barriers rehabilitation nursing reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献75

  • 1无.慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(3):195-206. 被引量:2044
  • 2中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5215
  • 3世界卫生组织烟草或健康合作中心 中国疾病预防控制中心控烟办公室 中国控制吸烟协会医院控烟专业委员会.中国临床戒烟指南(2007年版试行本)[J].国际呼吸杂志,2008,28:961-970.
  • 4中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本).中华心血管病杂志,2012,40:271-277.
  • 5Oldridge NB, Guyatt GH, Fischer ME, et al. Cardiac rehahilitation after myocardial infarction: combined experience of randomized clinical trials.JAMA, 1988,260 :945-950.
  • 60' Connor GT, BuringJE, Y usuf S, et al. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1989,80 :234-244.
  • 7Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA, et al. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Circulation,201O, 121 :63-70.
  • 8Goel K, Lennon RJ, Tilbury RT, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in the community. Circulation, 2011,123: 2344-2352.
  • 9AustinJ, Williams R, Ross L, et al. Randomised controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients with heart failure. EurJ Heart Fail,2005,7:411417.
  • 100' Connor CM, Whellan OJ, Lee KL, et al. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF?ACTION randomized controlled trial.JAMA, 2009, 301 : 1439- 1450.

共引文献711

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部