期刊文献+

重新认识“评价”——以“三位数乘两位数的笔算”教学为例

原文传递
导出
摘要 推进基于课程标准的教学已经成为当下课堂教学改革的主流,其中影响推进工作质量的关键因素是“评价”的设计与实施。然而,长期以来人们对“评价”的认识和实践,与现代意义上的“评价”存在着较大差异,亟需进行思想层面的厘定,并指导教学实践层面的改进。下面重点阐述教学设计中的“评价”和教学实施中的“评价”,以期为教师重新认识“评价”提供理论和实践两个方面的参考。
出处 《小学数学教育》 2023年第7期15-16,共2页
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1S. ALAN COHEN.Instructional Alignment: Searching for a Magic Bullet. Educational Research . 1987
  • 2Porter, A.C,Smithson, J.L.Are content standards being implemented in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. From the capitol to the classroom:Standards-based reform in the states-One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part Ⅱ . 2001
  • 3Council of chief states school officers.State Standard and State Assessment Systems:A Guide to Alignment. . 2000
  • 4Hansche,L.N.Meeting three requirements of title:Handbook for the development of performances stands. . 1998
  • 5Ananda,S.Rethinking issues of alignment under No Child Left Behind. . 2003
  • 6Helena Pedrosa de Jesus,Aurora Coelho Moreira.??The role of students’ questions in aligning teaching, learning and assessment: a case study from undergraduate sciences(J)Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education . 2009 (2)
  • 7RichardHall.??Aligning learning, teaching and assessment using the web: an evaluation of pedagogic approaches(J)British Journal of Educational Technology . 2002 (2)
  • 8Duncan,R.G.Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching . 2009
  • 9Bhola,D.S,Impara,J.S,Buckendahl,C.W.Alignment tests with states’’content standards:Methods and issues. Educational Measurement . 2003
  • 10Popham,W.J.Curriculum, instruction, and assessment:Amiable allies or phony friends?. The Teachers College Record . 2004

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部