摘要
物权法面临诸多争议问题,其中债权物权化是早已存在者,至今争议未歇,因债权物权化仍须受物权法定主义之限制,故法院于裁判上对某种债权创设物权效力时,就其物权化之要件事实及其效果,严密予以确定,不许以违反诚信原则、权利滥用原则等一般条款,任意冲破物权法定主义之框架限制;至电子科技之快速发展,带来数据新型资产之定位及信息革命对公示机制之冲击效应,则为物权法之新挑战。对于前者,于未及立法规范前,习惯法、判例法之运用,当为最佳因应之道;对于后者,登记技术之创新,讲求低成本、高效率,不重在如实反映物权状态,然因物权公示内容之正确性,恰可降低交易之信息成本,实现资产有效配置之法律重要任务,故信息革命对公示机制之变革力道,似仍须有法律之配套,方能展现。
The Real Right Law has been confronted with many controversial issues,such as"the propertization of obligatory rights"has long been an issue and has not been settled.Since the propertization of obligatory rights must be limited by the principle of legality of right in rem,the court,when creating the effect of a real rights for certain creditor's rights in judgment,tended to strictly determine the essential facts and effects of its in rem rights,and it is not allowed to violate the principle of good faith and the principle of abuse of rights,and other general provisions to break through the framework limit of the principlec of legality of right in rem at will.The rapid development of electronic technology has brought about the positioning of new data assets and the impact of the information revolution on the publicity mechanism,which is a new challenge to the property law.For the former,the application of customary law and case law should be the best way to respond before the regulations were legislated.For the latter,the innovation of registration technology emphasizes low cost and high efficiency,rather than focusing on true reflection of the status of property rights.However,because of the correctness of the content of property rights publicity,the information cost of transactions can be reduced and the legal task of effective asset allocation can be achieved.Therefore,it seems that the impact of the reform of the information revolution on the publicity mechanism still needs legal support to be shown.
出处
《中外法学》
北大核心
2023年第2期406-424,共19页
Peking University Law Journal
关键词
物权法
债权物权化
商业思维
信息革命
法学方法
Real Right Law
The Propertization of Obligatory Rights
Business Thinking
Information Revolution
Method of Jurisprudence