期刊文献+

床旁超声与生物标志物对儿童脓毒症心肌抑制诊断和脓毒性休克预后的评估价值 被引量:1

The value of bedside ultrasound and biomarkers in the diagnosis of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction and prognosis of septic shock in children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价床旁超声和生物标志物对儿童脓毒症心肌抑制的诊断和对脓毒性休克患儿28 d死亡结局的预测效能。方法前瞻性收集2019年1月至2021年7月收入上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心重症医学科,符合入选标准并诊断为脓毒性休克的患儿。记录第1、2、3、7、10天床旁超声结果,同时采集血液标本,检测心肌损伤标志物,并记录28 d预后。根据左室射血分数(LVEF)分为心肌抑制组和非心肌抑制组,其中LVEF<50%或较基线水平下降≥10%者定义为心肌抑制,比较组间心脏超声参数和生物标志物的差异。Logistic回归分析发生脓毒症心肌抑制的独立危险因素和脓毒性休克28 d死亡结局的独立危险因素。受试者工作特征曲线评价不同指标对预测脓毒症心肌抑制及脓毒性休克患儿28 d死亡结局的效能。结果共入组57例患儿,心肌抑制组28例,非心肌抑制组29例,单因素分析显示两组的小儿危重病例评分、N末端B型钠尿肽前体(NT-proBNP)、LVEF和左室短轴缩短率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示LVEF(OR=0.890,95%CI 0.818~0.969,P=0.007)、NT-proBNP(OR=1.000,95%CI 1.000~1.000,P=0.015)是脓毒症心肌抑制的独立危险因素。28 d存活42例,死亡15例。单因素分析显示小儿死亡危险评分Ⅲ、儿童序贯器官功能障碍评分、肌钙蛋白I及二尖瓣环收缩期位移(MAPSE)在存活组和死亡组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示MAPSE是脓毒性休克患儿28 d死亡结局的独立危险因素(OR=85.670,95%CI 1.685~4356.736,P=0.026)。MAPSE联合肌钙蛋白I及小儿死亡危险评分Ⅲ、儿童序贯器官功能障碍评分(曲线下面积=0.926)相对于单独MAPSE(曲线下面积=0.727)能更好地预测脓毒性休克患儿28 d死亡。结论脓毒症生物标志物NT-proBNP在脓毒症心肌抑制早期明显升高。MAPSE在脓毒症心肌抑制组和非心肌抑制组间无明显差异,但与脓毒性休克患儿预后相关。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using bedside ultrasound and serum biomarkers for the prediction of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction(SIMD)and mortality in septic shock patients.Methods The patients diagnosed as septic shock were enrolled in the study from January 2019 to July 2021 in PICU at Shanghai Children′s Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine.Bedside ultrasound results were recorded at day 1,2,3,7 and 10.Blood samples were collected at the same time,markers of myocardial injury were detected,and prognosis was recorded at 28 days.According to the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),children with septic shock were divided into SIMD group and non-SIMD group.Those with LVEF<50%or decreased by≥10%from baseline level were defined as SIMD.Differences in cardiac ultrasound parameters and biomarkers between two groups were compared.Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors for SIMD and the independent risk factors for death at 28 days after septic shock.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)was used to evaluate the efficacy of different indicators in predicting SIMD and the death outcome of children with septic shock on 28 days.Results A total of 57 children were enrolled,including 28 cases in SIMD group and 29 cases in non-SIMD group.Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in pediatric critical illness score,N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),LVEF and left ventricular short axis shortening rate between two groups(P<0.05).Logistic analysis demonstrated that LVEF(OR=0.890,95%CI 0.818-0.969,P=0.007)and NT-proBNP(OR=1.000,95%CI 1.000-1.000,P=0.015)could independently predict SIMD.There were 42 cases in survival group and 15 in non-survival group according to the prognosis on 28 days.Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in pediatric risk mortality scoreⅢ,pediatric sequential organ failure assessment,cardiac troponin I,and mitral annular plane systolic excursion(MAPSE)(P<0.05).Logistic analysis showed that only MAPSE independently predicted mortality(OR=85.670,95%CI 1.685-4356.736,P=0.026).Compared with MAPSE(AUC=0.727),MAPSE combined with pediatric risk mortality scoreⅢ,pediatric sequential organ failure assessment,cardiac troponin I(AUC=0.926)could be better to predict the 28 days prognosis of patients with septic shock on 28 days.Conclusion NT-proBNP increases significantly in the early stage of SIMD.MAPSE shows no difference between SIMD and non-SIMD patients.MAPSE is correlated with the prognosis of patient with septic shock.
作者 李娟珍 王莹 张建 孙思娟 滕腾 张芳 王竹林 项龙 钱娟 任宏 Li Juanzhen;Wang Ying;Zhang Jian;Sun Sijuan;Teng Teng;Zhang Fang;Wang Zhulin;Xiang Long;Qian Juan;Ren Hong(Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit,Shanghai Children's Medical Center,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China)
出处 《中国小儿急救医学》 CAS 2023年第4期281-285,共5页 Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2701800,2021YFC2701804) 浦东新区科技发展基金(PKJ2018-Y43)。
关键词 脓毒性休克 心肌抑制 儿童 床旁超声 生物标志物 Septic shock Myocardial dysfunction Children Point of care ultrasound Serum biomarkers
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1樊寻梅.儿科感染性休克(脓毒性休克)诊疗推荐方案[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(8):596-598. 被引量:205
  • 2Goldstein B,Giroir B,Randolph A,et al.International pediatric sepsis consensus conference:definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics[J].PediatrCrit Care Med,2005,6(1):2-8.
  • 3Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Rhodes A,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock,2012[J].Intensive Care Med,2013,39 (2):165-228.
  • 4Dohna-Schwake C,Felderhoff-Müser U.Early recognition of septic shock in Children[J].Klin Padiatr 2013,225 (4):201-205.
  • 5Biban P,Gaffuri M,Spaggiari S,et al.Early recognition and management of septic shock in children[J].Pediatr Rep,2012,4(1):e13.
  • 6Brierley J,Carcillo JA,Choong K,et al.Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock:2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine[J].Crit Care Med,2009,37(2):666-688.
  • 7Aneja R,Carcillo J.Differences between adult and pediatric septic shock[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2011,77(10):986-992.
  • 8Weil MH,Henning RJ.New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock.Thirteenth annual Becton,Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetsky Memorial Lecture[J].Anesth Analg,1979,58 (2):124-132.
  • 9Zawistowski CA.The management of sepsis[J].Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care,2013,43 (10):285-291.
  • 10Monagle P,Chan AK,Goldenberg NA,et al.Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children:Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis,9th ed:American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines[J].Chest,2012,141 (2 Suppl):e737s-801s.

共引文献226

同被引文献26

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部