期刊文献+

美国公共福利制度何以孱弱?——历史制度主义的分析视角 被引量:1

Why the U.S.Public Welfare System is Weak:From the Perspective of Historical Institutionalism
原文传递
导出
摘要 各国福利制度的演化与形成,皆因应其特定的历史时代背景,主要受供给和需求两方面驱动。供给侧取决于本国财政筹资能力,需求侧取决于国民福利意识与福利消费模式。20世纪初期极高生产力增长催生的农业国家主义思潮,驱使美国联邦政府后来将缩小收入差距、提高国民购买力视为应对“大萧条”危机和解决“生产过剩”的核心方案,由此形成了“重累进所得税、拒销售税”的税收制度,以及以私人信贷为主的消费金融模式。拒绝国家销售税大大限制了美国税制的增收能力,从而削弱了迈向福利国家的财政基础。针对累进税的附加福利税收豁免政策,则显著促进了私人福利体系的发展。家庭消费信贷的广泛发展弱化了公共福利需求,与之配套的税收豁免政策又对公共福利供给产生了挤出效应。失衡的税制与信贷型消费模式同福利制度相互影响、相互强化,导致美国福利国家的政治主张日渐瓦解、公共福利制度建设愈发孱弱。与此同时,美国私人福利体系却日益发展壮大。由于私人福利制度缺乏普惠性和公平性,最为脆弱的非正规就业群体和非就业群体几乎完全暴露于市场风险和社会风险之中,美国于是成为发达经济体中贫困人口占比最高的国家之一。这种公共福利制度的缺失内置了金融体系不稳定的诱因。 Each country􀆳s welfare system was built in response to its history and depended on the country􀆳s fiscal capacity,the welfare consciousness and consumption patterns.In the early 20th century,the agrarian statism,which was driven by the extremely high productivity,prompted the U.S.federal government to focus on reducing income disparities and stimulating consumption as the central solution to overproduction and the great depression.This led to a“pro-progressive income tax,anti-sales tax”tax system and a consumption model based on private credit.The rejection of the national sales tax greatly limited the revenue-raising capacity of the U.S.tax system and weakened the fiscal base for transitioning to a welfare state.At the same time,the additional welfare tax exemptions contributed significantly to the development of the private welfare system.The widespread household consumer credit has weakened public welfare demand,and the accompanying tax exemptions have had a crowding-out effect on public welfare provision.The imbalanced tax system and credit-based consumption patterns interacted with,reinforced,and consolidated the welfare system,ultimately leading to the disintegration of the political advocacy for the American welfare state and the weakening of the public welfare system.In contrast,the U.S.private welfare system has become increasingly prosperous.Due to the lack of inclusiveness and fairness in the private welfare system,the most vulnerable informal employment and unemployment groups are almost completely exposed to market and social risks,and the United States becomes the developed economy with the highest poverty rate.
作者 朱恒鹏 孙梦婷 Zhu Hengpeng;Sun Mengting(Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences/School of Economics,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences;School of Public Policy and Management,Tsinghua University/Center for Public Policy Research,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
出处 《经济思想史学刊》 2023年第1期119-138,共20页 Bulletin of the History of Economic Thought
基金 中国社会科学院创新工程重大科研规划项目“国家治理体系与治理能力现代化研究”(批准号:2019ZDGH014) 亚洲发展银行项目“财政体制现代化视角下的公共服务与社会保障制度改革”阶段性成果。
关键词 美国福利制度 税收制度 消费信贷模式 历史制度主义 U.S.Welfare System Tax System Consumer Credit Historical Institutionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献50

  • 1黄安年.社会救济时期的社会保障——17世纪初至20世纪30年代的美国[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),1997,42(4):33-40. 被引量:4
  • 2杨伟民.社会保障的理念基础及运行规则[J].社会学研究,1996(6):37-45. 被引量:8
  • 3[2]Eric R Kingson,James H Schulz. Social Security in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1997.
  • 4马克思 恩格斯.《共产党宣言》[A]..《马克思恩格斯全集》[M]第4卷[C].人民出版社,1958年版..
  • 5Goyburu,A.,Social Security and the"Risky"Status Quo.www.Heritage.org/press/commentary/ed091902.cfm?Renderforprint=1
  • 6Hamilton,J.,Social Security Q&A With Heritage's Social Security Project Manager James Hamilton.www.heritage.org/about/staff/jomeshamilton.cfm
  • 7John,D.C.,A Commission Must Avoid the Wrong Social Security Debate:It's Not About Trust Funds.www.heritage.org/about/staff/davidjohn.cfm
  • 8Kerry,B.and Rudman,W.,Social Security Shell Game,in Washington Post,Aug.,12,2002,page A15.
  • 9Krugman,P.,Fear of All Sums,New York Times,21,Jun.,2002.
  • 10National Review,Issue of,Nov.,11,2002.

共引文献121

同被引文献33

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部