中国“网络主权”理念国际认同影响因素与提升路径研究——基于31个案例的模糊集定性比较分析

Research on the Affecting Factors and Promotion Path of International Identity in China s“Cyber Sovereignty”——Based on 31 Cases Through fsQCA

本文旨在对中国“网络主权”理念的国际认同状况及其影响因素进行研究,为提升中国“网络主权”理念国际认同水平提供参考路径。研究从国际社会视角出发,结合国际实践理论提炼条件变量,通过模糊集定性比较分析法对31个案例进行分析,探求影响国际社会对中国“网络主权”理念认同水平的条件组合。中国“网络主权”理念国际认同结果存在5条低水平认同路径与1条高水平认同路径,其中低水平认同路径可以归纳为:(1)共同利益与正当性双元主导驱动型;(2)地缘政治风险主导下的正当性与价值追求驱动型;(3)意识形态驱动型;(4)意识形态逻辑下共同利益与价值追求驱动型;(5)意识形态、地缘政治风险与正当性共同驱动型。针对当前中国“网络主权”理念国际认同现状,需要以更加温和、客观的话语方式推进中国“网络主权”理念,增强国际发声能力并构建反叙事以破解相关谣言。

The objective of this paper is to study the status of China's international recognition of the concept of“cyber sovereignty”and its influencing factors,so as to provide a reference path for the improvement of China's international recognition of the concept of“cyber sovereignty”.In this paper,we adopt fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA)methodology from the perspective of international community and the explanatory variables are extracted from the combination of international practice theory.This paper conducts analysis for 31 cases and to explore the necessary condition combinations that affect the outcomes of international identity status of China's concept of cyber sovereignty.The study has found 5 low level identity paths and 1 high level identity path.Low level identity paths can be summarized as follows.①the dual-dominated driving type by common interests and legitimacy;②legitimacy and value pursuit driving type under the geopolitical risks leading;③ideological driving type;④common interests and value pursuit driving type under ideological logic;⑤ideology,geopolitical risk and legitimacy driving type.In response to the current situation of international recognition of China's concept of“cyber sovereignty”,China needs to promote the concept of China s“cyber sovereignty”in a more moderate and objective way,enhance capability of international communication and construct counter-narrative to crack relevant rumors.