期刊文献+

自我关怀干预在护士中应用效果的系统评价 被引量:2

Effect of self-compassion intervention in nurses:a systematic review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价自我关怀干预在护士中的应用效果,为构建我国护士自我关怀干预方案提供循证依据。方法计算机检索Web of Science、OVID、Medline、EBSCO、PubMed、Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普网和万方数据库中自我关怀干预在护士中应用的相关研究,检索时限为建库至2022年7月1日。由2名研究者独立检索、筛选文献及资料提取。结果共纳入15篇文献。自我关怀干预内容以正念干预为主,干预形式包括单次自我关怀课程培训和一定周期的自我关怀项目。自我关怀干预可以降低护士的压力与倦怠水平,提升护士的正念和自我同情水平。结论自我关怀干预在护士中应用效果良好,未来可基于我国国情开发本土化的护士自我关怀干预方案。 Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of self-compassion intervention in nurses,and to provide evidence-based basis for the construction of self-compassion intervention program for nurses in China.Methods Articles on the effect of self-compassion intervention in nurses were searched through Web of Science,OVID,Medline,EBSCO,PubMed,Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,VIP and Wanfang Data.The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of each database to June 1,2022.Two researchers screened,evaluated the articles and extracted the data respectively.Results A total of 15 articles were included.The self-compassion intervention content mainly focused on mindful intervention,the intervention form included a single self-compassion course training and a certain period self-compassion project.Self-compassion intervention could reduce nurses'stress and burnout,improve nurses'mindfulness and self-compassion.Conclusions Self-compassion intervention has a good intervention effect in nurses.In the future,targeted nurse self-compassion intervention program should be developed based on our national conditions.
作者 陈玮 李晨 徐奕旻 Chen Wei;Li Chen;Xu Yimin(School of Nursing,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2023年第13期1772-1777,共6页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 护士 自我关怀 干预效果 系统评价 Nurses Self-compassion Intervention effect Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,2009.264-269.
  • 2Moher D,Cook D J,Eastwood S. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials:the QUOROM statement[J].The Lancet,1999.1896-1900.
  • 3Group M. Meta-Analysis of Observational studies in Epidemiology.A proposal for reporting[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,2000.2008-2012.
  • 4Sacks HS,Berrier J,Reitman D. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1987.450-455.
  • 5Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J].European Journal of Epidemiology,2010.603-605.
  • 6Slim K,Nini E,Forestier D. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors):development and validation of a new instrument[J].Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery,2003.712-716.
  • 7Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary[J].Controlled Clinical Trials,1996.1-12.
  • 8Higgins J,Green S. Cochrane Collaboration:Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][M].John Wiley \& Sons Ltd and The Cochrane Collaboration,Chichester,2011.
  • 9Higgins JP,Altman DG,Gotzsche PC. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J].British Medical Journal,2011.d5928.
  • 10陈耀龙,李幼平,杜亮,王莉,文进,杨晓妍.医学研究中证据分级和推荐强度的演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008,8(2):127-133. 被引量:233

共引文献352

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部