期刊文献+

融入学科教学的跨学科素养评价: 内涵、实施与启示--以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省为例 被引量:4

Integrating into Subject Teaching:A New Evaluation Roadmap for Interdisciplinary Literacy Taking British Columbia,Canada as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对跨学科素养评价的标准模糊、工具失范、反馈机制缺失等实践问题,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省提出一种融入学科教学的跨学科素养评价新方案。该方案打破“学科知识”与“跨学科素养”二元结构,把学科作为跨学科素养生长与施评的载体,根据学科特性合理配置跨学科素养评价任务,倡导发展本位素养评价观。在具体实施上,包括制定嵌入学科的评价标准、设计以证据为中心的评价任务,开发聚焦课堂教学的质性评价工具,以及凸显发展目的的评价结果运用,突破学生跨学科素养发展“过程黑箱”、实现跨学科素养评价的有效落地。不列颠哥伦比亚省融入学科的跨学科素养评价实践对我国跨学科素养评价标准研制、策略执行以及工具开发等均有借鉴意义。 To solve the practical problems of interdisciplinary literacy evaluation,such as the lack of clear evaluation standards,useful evaluation tools,and effective feedback mechanisms,etc.,the province of British Columbia,Canada,proposed a new program for interdisciplinary literacy evaluation.Based on the symbiotic relationship between interdisciplinary literacy and disciplinary knowledge,this new program advocates for the integration of interdisciplinary literacy assessment into subject instruction.The specific implementation path of this evaluation method includes building a discipline-embedded evaluation standard system,designing evidence-centered evaluation tasks,and developing qualitative evaluation tools,to break the"black box"of students'interdisciplinary literacy development and improve the effectiveness of interdisciplinary literacy assessment.The practice of interdisciplinary literacy evaluation in BC,Canada,has reference significance for the formulation of evaluation standards,evaluation strategies,and evaluation tools in China.
作者 杜文彬 DU Wenbin(School of Education,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214100,China)
出处 《外国教育研究》 北大核心 2023年第4期3-18,共16页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 江苏省十四五教育科学研究规划课题“‘双减’背景下中小学课后服务质量监测机制研究”(项目编号:C-c2021/01/30)。
关键词 加拿大 跨学科 素养 素养评价 整合 Canada interdisciplinary literacy literacy evaluation integrate
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献110

  • 1张志祯,齐文鑫.教育评价中的信息技术应用:赋能、挑战与对策[J].中国远程教育,2021(3):1-11. 被引量:52
  • 2张华.“实践的课程范式”及其应用研究[J].全球教育展望,1998,28(5):26-31. 被引量:27
  • 3杜惠洁,舒尔茨.德国跨学科教学理念与教学设计分析[J].国外职业教育,2005(4):32-35. 被引量:3
  • 4Stiggins, R. J. Relevant classroom assessment training for teachers[J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991,10(1):7- 12.
  • 5AFT, NCME, NEA. Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students [ J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1990,9(4) ,30 - 32.
  • 6Schafer, W. D. & Lissitz, R.W.( 1987 ). Measurement training for school personnel: Recommendations and reality [ J ]. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (3), 57 - 63.
  • 7O' Sullivan, R. & Chanlnick,M. (1991). Measurement - related course work requirements for teacher certification and recertification [ J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10 (2), 17 - 19, 23.
  • 8Wise, S. L., Lukin, L. E., & Roos, L. L. (1991). Teacher beliefs about training in testing and measurement[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 42 ( 1 ), 37 - 42.
  • 9Schafer, W.D.(1993). Assessment literacy for teachers [J]. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 118 - 126.
  • 10Plake, B. S, Impera, J. C., & Fager, J. J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey [ J ]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 10-12,39.

同被引文献49

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部