期刊文献+

角度量化复位方法在颅底凹陷合并寰枢椎脱位治疗中的临床应用

Clinical application of a quantitative method of atlantoaxial reduction angle in basilar invagination
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨角度量化复位方法在颅底凹陷合并寰枢椎脱位治疗中的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2020年5月至2022年5月重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科收治的38例颅底凹陷合并寰枢椎脱位患者的临床和影像学资料。男性5例,女性33例,年龄(53.5±9.9)岁(范围:38~80岁)。患者均行后路C1~2小关节间融合器置入+枕颈间悬臂压棒复位术治疗,术前利用前期研究建立的寰枢椎复位几何模型测算复位角度,根据测算结果制备成品预弯钛棒,术中进行角度量化复位。采用配对样本t检验比较理论复位角度和实际复位角度的差异。结果所有患者顺利完成手术,斜坡枢椎角的术前理论复位角度为(10.62±1.78)°(范围:6.40°~13.20°),实际复位角度为(10.53±1.63)°(范围:6.70°~13.30°),差异无统计学意义(t=1.688,P=0.100);术前测算的理论术后后枕颈角为(117.37±5.88)°(范围:107.00°~133.00°),术后实际测量为(118.25±6.77)°(范围:105.40°~135.80°),差异亦无统计学意义(t=-0.737,P=0.466)。患者术后随访均>6个月,症状均明显改善,小关节间融合满意,未出现切口感染、内固定断裂、移位,无寰枢椎再失位等远期并发症。结论在颅底凹陷合并寰枢椎脱位的治疗中,角度量化复位方法可术前测算斜坡枢椎角的理论复位角度,指导术前制备相应角度的预弯钛棒,实现寰枢椎复位的角度量化。 Objectives To investigate the clinical application effect of a quantitative method of atlantoaxial reduction angle in basilar invagination.Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic data was conducted of 38 patients with complicated atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery,First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2020 to May 2022.There were 5 males and 33 females,aged(53.5±9.9)years(range:38 to 80 years).All patients underwent C1-2 interarticular fusion cage implantation+occipital-cervical fixation by pressing rob with the cantilever technique.The atlantoaxial reduction model of previous studies by our team was used to calculate the reduction angles before surgery.Then titanium rods of prebending angle were prepared according to the calculation before the operation.After that quantitative reduction of angle was performed during the operation.The paired t-test was used to compare the difference between the theoretical and actual reset value.Results The theoretical reduction angle of all patients was(10.62±1.78)°(range:6.40°to 13.20°),the actual reduction angle was(10.53±1.63)°(range:6.70°to 13.30°)and there was no statistical difference between them(t=1.688,P=0.100).The theoretical posterior occipitocervical angle after the operation of all patients was(117.37±5.88)°(range:107.00°to 133.00°),the actual posterior occipitocervical angle after the operation was(118.25±6.77)°(range:105.40°to 135.80°)and there was no statistical difference between them(t=-0.737,P=0.466).The postoperative follow-up time of the patients was more than 6 months and the symptoms of all patients were relieved.All patients had satisfactory fusion between small joints without incision infection,internal fixation fracture,displacement,atlantoaxial redislocation,and other long-term complications.Conclusion The quantitative method of atlantoaxial reduction angle in basilar invagination can calculate the theoretical reduction angle of the clivus axis angle and guide the preparation of the pre-bending titanium rod before surgery,so as to realize the quantification of the atlantoaxial reduction angle.
作者 曹飞 胡晓珺 康润峰 陈泰屹 邓豪 夏永智 晏怡 Cao Fei;Hu Xiaojun;Kang Runfeng;Chen Taiyi;Deng Hao;Xia Yongzhi;Yan Yi(Department of Neurosurgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China)
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第5期412-417,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 寰枢关节 脱位 颅底凹陷 悬臂压棒 角度量化 Atlanto-axial joint Dislocation Basilar invagination Cantilever press rod Angle of quantitative
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1田伟,刘波,李勤,胡临,刘亚军,李志宇,袁强.透视及导航下颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定术的临床应用经验[J].脊柱外科杂志,2003,1(1):15-18. 被引量:32
  • 2刘亚军,田伟,刘波,李勤,胡临,李志宇,袁强,孙玉珍.CT三维导航系统辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定技术的临床应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(7):630-633. 被引量:44
  • 3Sim HB, Lee JW, Park JT. Biomechanical evaluations of various C1 -C2 posterior fixation techniques[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2011, 36(6): E401-407.
  • 4Hott JS, Lynch JJ, Chamberlain RH, et al. Biomeehanical compar- ison of C1-2 posterior fixation techniques[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 2(2): 175-181.
  • 5Bundschuh C, Modic MT, Kearney F, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine: surface- coil MR imaging[J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 1988, 151(1): 181-187.
  • 6Wang S, Wang C, Passias PG, et al. Interobserver and intraobserv- er reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult popu- lation[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(9): 1349-1354.
  • 7Abumi K, Takada T, Shono Y, et al. Posterior occipitocervical re- construction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24(14): 1425-1434.
  • 8Reijnierse M, Bloem JL, Dijkmans BA, et al. The cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis: relationship between neurologic signs and morphology of MR imaging and radiographs[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1996, 25(2): 113-118.
  • 9Reiter MF, Boden SD. Inflammatory disorders of the cervical spine [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998, 23(24): 2755-2766.
  • 10Puschak TJ, Anderson PA. Posterior C1-C2 transarticular screws [J]. Tech Orthop, 2003, 17(3): 296-305.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部