期刊文献+

投资者违法行为抗辩的裁判基础和规则优化

The Judgment Basis and Rule Optimization on Defense of Investor’s Illegal Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际投资法保护的对象是合法和真实的投资,并不包括违反东道国法律或不诚信的投资。这就要求投资者在投资准入、经营管理和争端解决阶段审慎评估投资风险、合理规划投资行为。当东道国提出投资者存在违法行为时,仲裁庭通常依据投资定义中的合法性要求等排除对案件的管辖权。但这并不意味着任何违法行为都应终止于管辖权阶段,仍需结合时间节点和严重程度等因素进行考查。鉴于此,投资者行为的条约规制应着眼于明确义务范围、引入独立的违法抗辩规则和确立行为监督机制,进而构建结构对称的权利义务体系。 International investment law protects legitimate and genuine investments and does not include investments that violate host states’laws or are in bad faith.This requires investors to carefully evaluate investment risks and rationally plan investment behaviors in the stages of investment access,management and dispute settlement.When a host state proposes that an investor has violated the law,arbitral tribunal usually excludes the jurisdiction of case based on the legality requirement in the investment definition etc.,but this does not mean that any illegal behavior should be terminated at the jurisdiction stage,which still needs to be examined in combination with factors such as point-in-time and severity.Therefore,the treaty regulation of investors’behavior should focus on clarifying the scope of investors’obligations,introducing independent illegal-defense rules and establishing behavior supervision mechanism,so as to construct a symmetrical structure of rights and obligations system.
作者 钱嘉宁 QIAN Jianing
机构地区 浙江师范大学
出处 《国际商务研究》 北大核心 2023年第3期59-72,共14页 International Business Research
基金 司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“外资安全审查与国际投资法互动的法律困境与路径优化研究”(项目编号:21SFB4069)。
关键词 违法行为 抗辩权 投资者义务 行为监督 illegal behavior right of defense investor’s obligation behavior supervision
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献36

  • 1See Salini Costruttori S. p. A. and Italstrade S. p. A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4,July 23, 2001.
  • 2季烨:《国际投贤条约中投资定义的扩张及其限度》,载《北大法律评论》编辑委员会编:《北大法律评论》第12卷第1辑,北京大学出版社2011年版,第85108页.
  • 3See UNCTAD, Scope and Definition UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement II, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2011, p. 5, http://WWW, unctad, ch/en/docs/diaeia20102 en. pdf,2012 02--28.
  • 4See Kenneth J. Vandevelde, Bilateral Investment Treaties History, Policy and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 130.
  • 5See UNCTAD, Scope and Definition: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 1999, p. 24, http://WWW, unctad, org/en/docs/psiteiitdllv2, en. pdf,2012--02--28.
  • 6See Kenneth J. Vandevelde, U.S. International Investment Agreements, Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 118.
  • 7See Alasdair Ross Anderson et al v. Republic of Costa Rica,ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/3, May 19, 2010.
  • 8See Inceysa Vallisoletana S. L. v Republic of E1 Salvador,ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, August 2, 2006; Gustav F W Hamester Gm bH Co KG v. Republic of Ghana,ICSID Case No. ARB/07/24, June 18, 2010.
  • 9See Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Philippines,ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, August 16, 2007.
  • 10See Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A. . v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan,ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, August 27, 2009.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部