为病患代购管制药品的情与法冲突及化解路径

Conflicts between Reason Principle and Legal Principle in Purchasing Controlled Drugs for Patients and Its Resolution

为病患代购管制药品的案件在刑法上往往面临情与法的冲突。司法机关不愿意、却不得不定罪,只能在量刑时突破法律框架,尽量从轻。在刑法的实质解释下,为病患代购管制药品不成立贩卖毒品罪、非法经营罪或妨害药品管理罪,应处无罪。在刑事个案中,“情理”虽不能直接介入,但对刑法体系的适用具有批判功能。当“法理”分析的结论与公众的法直觉相违背时,应当检讨“法理”之适用过程是否出错,使刑事个案体现刑法正义,实现情与法的统一。

The cases of purchasing controlled drugs for patients often face conflicts of legal principle and reason principle in criminal law.The judicial authorities are unwilling,but have to convict,so they can only break the legal framework and be lenient in sentencing.Under the substantive interpretation of criminal law,purchasing controlled drugs on behalf of patients is not guilty of the crime of drug trafficking,illegal business practices or obstruction of drug administration,and should be treated as innocent.In criminal cases,rationality cannot be directly involved,but it has a critical function to the application of criminal law system.When the conclusion of legal analysis is contrary to the public's legal intuition,we should review whether the application process of law is wrong,to make criminal cases reflect criminal justice and realize the unity of legal principle and reason principle.