期刊文献+

高校思想政治理论课教师教学学术能力差异与影响因素研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 问题式专题化团队教学改革急需思政课教师高水平的教学学术。然而高校思政课教师教学学术水平的实证研究较为缺乏。研究编制包括组织支持、教学学术行为、教学学术认同、教学学术反思和教学学术转化五个维度在内的高校思政课教师教学学术水平问卷。经对11个变量的差异研究发现,不同学校类型师范教育背景、双肩挑身份、不同学校类型等影响教学学术总体水平;女教师学术身份与理念认同高于男教师;职称与学术水平可能存在不匹配情况;区位优势及班级规模影响部分学术水平;教师主要面临学术转化困境。 The Scholarship of Teaching(SoT)is an important part of teachers'academic work.It has been gradually attached importance to the policy level but lack of empirical research of ideological and political theory courses in colleges and universities.The project team,through theoretical exploration,individual interviews,expert consultation and small-scale testing,develops a questionnaire for SoT of theoretical ideology courses,encompassing five dimen-sions,i.e.organization support,teaching scholarship behavior,teaching scholar-ship recognition,teaching scholarship reflection and academic transformation.Key findings after a survey and variance analysis of 11 variables as followings:Although teachers of ideological and political theory courses in colleges and universities exhibit better overall of SoT,there are significant differences in the level of SoT with normal education background,shoulder carrying status and different types of schools.Colleges and universities should set up SoT concept,increase the depth and breadth of input in ideological and political course teaching,establish"teacher strengthening plan"and multiple evaluation system for ideological and political course teaching,introduce the talented person to relieve teaching pressure,combine teaching content with academic and life-oriented teaching,establish a mechanism to improve teaching academic ability,and promote the free flow of ideological and political course teaching academic ecology.
机构地区 江西理工大学
出处 《高教学刊》 2023年第16期171-175,共5页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 江西省社会科学基金高校思想政治理论课研究专项“新时代高校思政课教师教学学术能力及影响因素研究”(SZ212025) 赣州社会科学课题“立德树人背景下中小学思政课教学学术型教师教研方式创新实践研究”(2022-025-0304) 2020年江西理工大学课程思政项目“毛泽东思想和中国特色社会主义理论体系概论”阶段性成果(无编号)。
关键词 思想政治理论课 教学学术 影响因素 学术成长 学术水平调查 ideological and political course teaching and academic influence factor academic development academic level survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献44

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部