期刊文献+

社会本质主义对偏见的影响及其机制

Effects of social essentialism on prejudice and its mechanisms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会本质主义是关于社会类别的直觉理论,是对社会类别差异的一种生物性归因。大量研究显示社会本质主义助长了种族、性别与阶层偏见,但也可以减少对肥胖、同性恋与罪犯的偏见。在种族、性别与阶层等被强加的社会类别中,稳定性线索强,社会本质主义导致人们认为该社会类别下的群体之间的差异难以改变,折扣环境解释,进而促进偏见;在肥胖、同性恋与罪犯等个体选择的社会类别中,可控性线索强,社会本质主义导致人们认为该社会类别下的一些群体成员的污名身份是不可控的,折扣个体选择的解释,进而减少偏见。未来研究应关注导致不同后果的社会本质主义信念产生和发展的过程,在此基础上开发出系统、持续、有效的干预措施,为消除偏见,减少群际冲突,推进和谐社会建设提供科学心理学方案。 Social essentialism is an intuitive theory about social categories.It implies that members of one social category share unobservable intrinsic characteristics that determine their membership and generate observable similarities between them.There are numerous studies showing that social essentialism contributes to prejudice based on race,gender,and class.but also reduces prejudice against obesity,homosexuality and criminals.In forced social categories where stability cues are strong(e.g.race,gender,and class),social essentialism leads people to believe that differences between groups are hard to change,thus increasing prejudice by discounting environmental explanations.In chosen social categories where controllability cues are strong(e.g.obesity,homosexuality,criminals),social essentialism leads people to believe that the stigmatized identities of some group members are uncontrollable,thus reducing prejudice by discounting chosen explanations.For future research,it would be useful to examine how social essentialist beliefs emerge,develop and ultimately lead to different outcomes,and from there,to develop systematic,sustained,and effective interventions aimed at eliminating prejudice and promoting harmony within society using scientific psychological solutions.
作者 包诗钺 张靖 冀月欣 胡小勇 BAO Shiyue;ZHANG Jing;JI Yuexin;HU Xiaoyong(Faculty of Psychology,Southwest University,Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality,Ministry of Education,Chongqing 400715,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第6期1068-1077,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(22YJA190003) 重庆社会科学规划一般项目(2021NDYB089) 2020年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项重点(招标)项目(SWU2009206)资助。
关键词 社会本质主义 偏见 因果折扣 社会类别 social essentialism prejudice causal discounting social categories
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献76

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3706
  • 2马戎.理解民族关系的新思路——少数族群问题的“去政治化”[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,41(6):122-133. 被引量:373
  • 3张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量:664
  • 4汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(修订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999..
  • 5Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 228-235.
  • 6Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2007). Psychological essentialism and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotype- consistent versus stereotype-inconsistent information. The Journal of social psychology, 147(5), 531-541.
  • 7Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2008). Immigration from the perspective of hosts and immigrants: Roles of psychological essentialism and social identity. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 11(2), 127-140.
  • 8Bonham, V. L., Warshauer-Baker, E., & Collins, F. S. (2005). Race and ethnicity in the genome era: The complexity of the constructs. American Psychologist, 60(1), 9-15.
  • 9Brewer, M. B., & Pierce, K. P. (2005). Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personalic and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 428-437.
  • 10Chao, M. (2009). Essentializing race: Its implication to social categorization and racial perception. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

共引文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部