压抑与生产:福柯与精神分析之争的实质与出路

Repression and Production:The Essence and Outlet of the Dispute Between Foucault and Psychoanalysis

为了正视并回应福柯对于“压抑假说”的批判,需要回顾精神分析发明“性欲”的历史语境,梳理压抑假说的来龙去脉,尤其是澄清弗洛伊德与马尔库塞两人压抑假说之间的重要差异。在此基础上,通过分析福柯对压抑假说的批判以及对生产问题的强调,凸显这一批判本身以及对这种批判的理解可能存在的问题。最终,通过找到福柯与精神分析相关理论之间的潜在对接点,揭示围绕压抑与生产而展开的这场争论的实质,以及“基于压抑的生产”这一可能的出路。

In order to face up to and respond to Foucault’s criticism of the“repression hypothesis”,this article first reviews the historical context of the invention of“sexuality”by psychoanalysis,sorts out the ins and outs of the repression hypothesis,and especially clarifies the major differences between Freud’s and Marcuse’s repression hypothesis.On this basis,after introducing Foucault’s related analysis and criticism of the repression hypothesis and his emphasis on production,this article inspects the criticism itself and points out the possible problematic understanding of it.In the end,by finding the potential connection point between Foucault and psychoanalysis,this article attempts to reveal the essence of the controversy around repression and production,and“production based on repression”as a possible way out of this controversy.