期刊文献+

营养风险筛查指导干预模式在口腔癌患者围手术期的应用效果 被引量:1

Application effect of nutritional risk screening-guided intervention model on perioperative period of oral cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨营养风险筛查指导干预模式在口腔癌患者围手术期的干预效果。方法以2021年1~12月在重庆医科大学附属口腔医院接受择期外科手术的110例口腔癌患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法分对照组和观察组。对照组54例患者于围手术期开展常规饮食护理指导,观察组56例患者于围手术期开展营养风险筛查指导干预模式。对比2组患者的营养风险、生活质量、营养指标、切口愈合情况和住院时间等。结果术后2周,观察组存在营养风险的占比低于对照组(P<0.05)。手术当日和术后2周,2组的总蛋白、白蛋白、球蛋白和血红蛋白水平均高于入院24 h,且观察组均高于同期对照组;2组在术后2周的上述营养指标均高于手术当日,对比均存在统计学差异(P均<0.05)。术后2周,2组的欧洲癌症研究治疗组织的生命质量核心问卷各维度评分均高于术前(P均<0.05),且观察组均高于对照组(P均<0.05)。观察组的胃肠道不良反应总发生率低于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,切口愈合情况优于对照组(P均<0.05)。结论营养风险筛查指导干预模式可降低口腔癌患者围手术期的营养不良风险,减少胃肠道不良反应,缩短住院时间,促进切口愈合,并改善营养指标和生活质量。 Objective To explore the intervention effect of nutritional risk screening-guided intervention model on the oral cancer patients during perioperative period.Methods A total of 110 oral cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment at Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects.They were allocated into a control group and an observation group via random number table method.The 54 patients in the control group were given routine diet nursing and guidance during the perioperative period,while the 56 patients in the observation group were given nutritional risk screening-guided intervention model during the perioperative period.The nutritional risk,quality of life,nutritional indicators,incision healing,and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.Results At 2 weeks after surgery,the proportion of patients with nutritional risk in the observation group was less than that in the control group(P<0.05).On the day of surgery and at 2 weeks after surgery,the levels of total protein,albumin,globulin,and hemoglobin in the two groups were higher than those at 24 hrs after admission,and the above nutritional indicators in the observation group were higher than those in the control group.The above nutritional indicators of the two groups at 2 weeks after surgery were higher than those on the day of surgery.The differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).At 2 weeks after surgery,the scores of all dimensions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire in the two groups were higher than those before surgery(all P<0.05),and the scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.05).The total incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group.The hospital stay was shorter than that in the control group.The incision healing was better than that in the control group(all P<0.05).Conclusion Nutritional risk screening-guided intervention model can reduce the malnutrition risk of oral cancer patients during perioperative period,reduce the gastrointestinal adverse reactions,shorten the hospital stay,promote the incision healing,and improve the nutritional indicators and quality of life.
作者 田境 胡琼 粟洪艳 李勇 TIAN Jing;HU Qiong;SU Hongyan;LI Yong(Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences,Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education,Chongqing,401147,China)
出处 《中西医结合护理(中英文)》 2023年第3期5-8,共4页 Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
关键词 口腔癌 围手术期 营养风险筛查指导干预模式 营养指标 oral cancer perioperative period nutritional risk screening-guided intervention model nutritional indicator
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献100

  • 1范明思.快速康复理念在喉全切除术围术期护理中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(S2):217-218. 被引量:1
  • 2马顺然,周云峰.肠内营养对食管癌手术患者胃肠道耐受性的影响[J].医学信息,2017,30(5):81-82. 被引量:2
  • 3吴国豪,刘中华,郑烈伟,全应军,吴肇汉.普外科住院患者营养状况评价及预后分析[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(11):693-696. 被引量:95
  • 4江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1354
  • 5罗家洪,万崇华,张灿珍,李晓江,张晓磬,孟琼.头颈部癌患者生命质量研究概况[J].中国肿瘤,2007,16(11):852-854. 被引量:1
  • 6Zhao H, Kanda K. Translation and validation of the standard Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30[J]. Qual Life Res, 2000,9(2) : 129-137.
  • 7Yang Z, Meng Q, Luo J, et al. Development and validation of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-HN35 for patients with head and neck cancer [J].Support Care Cancer, 2012,20(7) : 1555-1564.
  • 8Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, et al. A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ HN35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group[J] , Eur J Cancer,2000,36(14) :1796-1807.
  • 9Toth G, Sakaguchi T, Mikami Y, et al. A pilot study of the translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the EORTChead and neck cancer quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-HN35) for use in Japan[-J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2005,32(2) : 175-183.
  • 10Chic WC, Hong RL, Lai CC, et al. Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: validation of the Taiwan Chi- nese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ- Hb-N35[J]. Qual Life Res,2003,12(1) :93-98.

共引文献109

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部