摘要
詹姆逊认为,伴随资本主义的全球化发展,辩证法理应调整其存在形态。与“体系说”、“方法说”的辩证法不同,“空间辩证法”再现的是当代社会生活关于本质与现象、形式与内容的矛盾对立与其统一可能;因而在理论构成上,辩证法表现为两个层面,一方面以揭示“共时性”“历时性”与“矛盾性”三方面的“非同一性”原则为特征,另一方面则以明确“生产方式”的结构性关系的“总体性”立场为内核;而《资本论》之所以被詹姆逊视为切中现实的辩证法典范,是因为马克思便是通过分析人类生存空间的碎片化,以及抽象空间对自然空间的同一化来把握当代社会的总体性危机,进而完成对资本主义统治方式及其反抗条件的揭露与说明。
Jameson believes that dialectics should adjust its form with the development of capitalist globalization.Different from the"Systematic Dialectics"and"Methodological Dialectics",The"Dialectic of Space"represents the contradiction between essence and phenomenon,form and content incontemporaryy social life,and the possibility of its unification.In terms of theoretical structure,this dialectic is manifested in two aspects.On the one hand,it takes revealing the principle of"non identity"in three aspects of"synchronism","diachronism"and"contradictoriness"as its basic feature;On the other hand,it takes the"totality"position with clarifying the structural relationship of the"mode of production"as its core of thinking;The reason why"The Capital"is regarded by Jameson as a model for grasping reality is that Marx analyzed the total crisis of contemporary society by analyzing the fragmentation of human living space and the integration of abstract space with natural space.This is also the reason why he further revealed and explained the capitalist ruling mode and its resistance conditions.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2022年第4期161-177,共17页
Contemporary Marxism Review