期刊文献+

PET/CT代谢参数不同测量方式及计算方法对食管癌患者总生存期的预测价值

Predictive value of different measurement methods and calculation methods of PET/CT metabolic parameters on the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究18F-FDG PET/CT代谢参数不同测量方式及计算方法在食管癌(EC)患者总生存期(OS)预测中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析接受PET/CT检查的34例Ⅰ~Ⅳ期EC患者的相关资料,采用Mann-Whitney U非参数检验比较各组代谢参数的差异。通过勾画的感兴趣区域系统计算出不同阈值的最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)、肿瘤代谢体积(MTV)、病变总糖酵解(TLG)、全身肿瘤代谢体积(MTVwb)、全身总病灶糖酵解(TLGwb),按最佳截断值分成高、低值两组后绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,用log-rank法检验曲线差异。分析治疗前原发灶SUVmax、MTV30、MTV40、MTV50、TLG30、TLG40、TLG50、MTVwb、TLGwb及病灶厚度、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、TNM分期、临床分期、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)对患者OS的预测价值。结果至随访末期,共死亡17例(50.0%),中位生存期为16.5个月,半年生存率为81.97%,1年生存率为66.5%。以中位生存时间16.5个月为界限进行分组,中位生存时间≤16.5个月和中位生存时间>16.5个月患者的SUVmax、MTVwb、TLGwb及MTV、TLG差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。不同MTV30、MTV40、MTV50、TLG40、TLG50、SUVmax、年龄、BMI、病灶厚度、cT分期、cN分期、cM分期、临床分期患者的生存曲线比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);TLG30、TLGwb、NLR、ALP低值组生存率高于TLG30、TLGwb、NLR、ALP高值组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论治疗前TLG30、TLGwb对于EC患者的预后有一定预测价值,可为临床筛选预后不良的患者提供参考依据,从而制订精准化、个体化的治疗方案。 Objective To investigate the application value of different measurement methods and calculation methods of 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in the prediction of overall survival(OS)in patients with esophageal cancer(EC).Methods The related data of 34 patients with stage I-IV EC who underwent PET/CT examination were retrospectively analyzed.The differences of metabolic parameters among groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test.The maximum standard uptake value(SUVmax),metabolic tumor volume(MTV),total lesion glycolysis(TLG),whole body metabolic tumor volume(MTVwb)and whole body total lesion glycolysis(TLGwb)of different thresholds were calculated through the delineated region of interest system,and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted after the patients were divided into two groups with high and low values according to the optimal cutoff values,and the differences of curves were tested by the log-rank method.The predictive value of primary lesion SUVmax,MTV30,MTV40,MTV50,TLG30,TLG40,TLG50,MTVwb,TLGwb,as well as lesion thickness,age,body mass index(BMI),TNM stage,clinical stage,neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and alkaline phosphatase(ALP)before treatment on OS in patients were analyzed.Results By the end of follow-up,there were 17 deaths(50.0%)with a median OS of 16.5 months,a half-year survival rate of 81.97%and a 1-year survival rate of 66.5%.Grouping by the median survival time 16.5 months,the differences of SUVmax,MTVwb,TLGwb,MTV and TLG between patients with median survival time≤16.5 months and patients with median survival time>16.5 months were statistically significant(all P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the survival curves of patients with different MTV30,MTV40,MTV50,TLG40,TLG50,SUVmax,age,BMI,lesion thickness,cT stage,cN stage,cM stage,and clinical stage(all P>0.05).The survival rate of TLG30,TLGwb,NLR and ALP low value groups were higher than that of TLG30,TLGwb,NLR and ALP high value groups,with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).Conclusion TLG30 and TLGwb have a certain predictive value for the prognosis of patients with EC before treatment,which can provide a reference basis for clinical screening of patients with poor prognosis to make a precise and individualized treatment regimen.
作者 黄明捷 蒲维维 丘文明 刘子雅 韦红娇 黄馨 庞丁华 李宁 柴华 肖国有 HUANG Mingjie;PU Weiwei;QIU Wenming;LIU Ziya;WEI Hongjiao;HUANG Xin;PANG Dinghua;LI Ning;CHAI Hua;XIAO Guoyou(Department of Nuclear Medicine,Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning 530021,Guangxi,China)
出处 《微创医学》 2023年第2期159-164,共6页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
基金 广西科技计划项目(编号:桂科AB19110015) 广西高等教育本科教学改革工程项目(编号:2022JGA149) 广西医科大学青年科学基金项目(编号:GXMUYSF202226) 广西医科大学教育教学改革立项项目(编号:2020XJGZ05、2020XJGB16、2021XJGA14、2021XJGB56、2022XJGY94) 广西医科大学一流本科课程立项项目(编号:2022YLKC27)。
关键词 食管癌 PET/CT TLG TLGwb MTV 总生存期 Esophageal cancer PET/CT TLG TLGwb MTV Overall survival
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献37

  • 1袁双虎,于金明,于甬华,杨新华,付政,杨国仁,郭洪波,王晓航,周英智,陈少卿.^(18)F-脱氧葡萄糖PET-CT检测食管癌病变长度的临床价值[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(5):389-392. 被引量:45
  • 2Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer [ J ].New Engl J Med,2003, 349 ( 23 ) : 2241-2252. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMra035010.
  • 3Kato H, Nakajima M, Sohda M, et al. The clinical application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict survival in patients with operable esophageal cancer [J]. Cancer, 2009, 115 ( 14): 3196- 3203.DOI : 10.1002/cncr.24399.
  • 4Kajiwara T, Hiasa Y, Nishina T, et al. Maximum standardized uptake value in tSF- fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography is associated with advanced tumor factors in esophageal cancer [J]. Mol Clin 0ncol,2014, 2 ( 2 ) : 313-321. DOI: 10. 3892/ mco.2014. 238.
  • 5Omloo JMT, van Heijl M, Hoekstra OS, et al. FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients : a review [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011,18 ( 12 ) : 3338-3352. DOI : 10.1245/s 10434-011-1732-1.
  • 6Pan LL, Gu P, Huang G, et al. Prognostic significance of SUV on PET-CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 21 (9) : 1008-1015. DOI: 10. 1097/MEG.ObO13e328323 d6fa.
  • 7Suzuki A, Xiao LC, Hayashi Y, et al. Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy [ J ]. Cancer, 2011, ! 17 ( 21 ) : 4823 -4833. DOI : 10. 1002/cncr.26122.
  • 8Brown C, Howes B, Jamieson GG, et al. Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer [ J] .World J Surg,2012,36(5) : 1089-1095.DOI : 10.1007/s00268-012-1470-y.
  • 9Hatt M, Visvikis D, Albarghach NM, et al. Prognostic value of FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology [ J ].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2011,38 (7) : 1191-1202.DOI : 10.1007/s00259-011-1755-7.
  • 10Shum WY, Ding H J, Liang JA, et al. Use of pretreatment metabolic tumor volumes on PET-CT to predict the survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus treated by curative surgery [ J ]. Anticancer Res, 2012,32 (9) : 4163 -4168.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部