期刊文献+

重大疫情下社会情绪的演变机制——基于Twitter和GDELT等大数据的分析 被引量:4

Evolutionary Mechanisms of Social Sentiment under Pandemics:An Analysis Based on Big Data such as Twitter and GDELT
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于Twitter和GDELT等互联网大数据,结合风险沟通、风险应对等风险治理因素,分析重大疫情下社会恐慌、焦虑和抑郁等社会情绪的演变机制。重大疫情下主要负面情绪包括恐慌、焦虑和抑郁等,这些负面情绪大规模爆发主要集中在第一波疫情初期,后期疫情反弹期间负面情绪波动幅度明显要小。本文分别从威胁感知与应对效能、社会压力与社会支持的分析框架解释恐慌和抑郁情绪的演变。世界各地负面情绪的变动既有相似性,也有多样性,这与世界各地抗疫模式的多样性以及文化特征因素密切相关。本研究的发现对于应急管理和社会心态引导具有重要参考意义。 Based on big data such as Twitter and GDELT,this paper analyzes the mechanisms of the evolution of social emotions such as social panic,anxiety and depression during a pandemic by combining risk communication,risk response and other risk management factors.The main negative emotions during a pandemic include panic,anxiety,and depression,etc.The large-scale outbreak of these negative emotions is mainly concentrated in the initial wave of the pandemic,and the fluctuation of negative emotions during the rebound of the later pandemic is significantly smaller.In this paper,we explain the evolution of panic and depression from the analytical frameworks of threat perception and coping efficacy,social stress and social support,respectively.The variability of negative emotions around the world is both similar and diverse,which is closely related to the diversity of pandemic resilience patterns around the world as well as cultural identity factors.The findings of this study have important implications for emergency management and social mentality guidance.
作者 龚为纲 朱萌 陈浩 Gong Weigang;Zhu Meng;Chen Hao
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第3期203-225,M0007,共24页 Sociological Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“基于大数据的社会情绪风险与网络集群事件治理研究”(22BSH024) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“基于大数据的西方主要社会思潮发展动态及其有效引导研究”(18YJC710016)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1中山大学人类学系课题组.SARS与社会舆论反应的研究[J].广东青年干部学院学报,2003(3):33-37. 被引量:1
  • 2罗会明,黄吉城,周端华,李灵辉,郑夔,秦鹏哲,何剑峰,陈秋霞,梁文佳,彭国文,刘于飞,许锐恒,林锦炎.广东省2003-2004年SARS的流行与控制[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2006,22(4):326-329. 被引量:6
  • 3郑晓华 舒良 等.状态-特质焦虑问卷在长春的测试报告[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(2):60-62.
  • 4Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Risk Analysis,1987, 236(17): 280-285
  • 5Slovic P. Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis,1999, 19(4): 689-701
  • 6Covello V T,Peters R G,Wojtecki J G,et al. Risk Communication, the West Nile Virus Epidemic, and Bioterrorism: Responding to the Communication Challenges Posed by the Intentional or Unintentional Release of a Pathogen in an Urban Setting. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,2001,78(2):382-391
  • 7Svenson O. Mental Model of Risk, Communication, and Action: Reflections on Social Amplification of Risk. Risk Analysis,1988,8(2): 199-200
  • 8Wiegman O,Gutteling J M. Risk Appraisal and Risk Communication: Some Empirical Data From The Netherlands Reviewed. Basic & Applied Social Psychology ,1995,16(1/2):227-249
  • 9Wiegman O,Gutteling J M,Boer H. Verification of Information Through Direct Experiences With an Industrial Hazard. Basic & Applied Social Psychology,1991, 12(3):325-339
  • 10曹劲松.论拟态环境的主体建构[J].南京社会科学,2009(2):98-103. 被引量:57

共引文献170

同被引文献73

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部