期刊文献+

数字技术驱动传统非互联网企业数字创新绩效的作用机理——组织合法性的调节作用 被引量:9

The Mechanism of Digital Technology Driving Digital Innovation Performance in Non-Internet Enterprises:The Moderating Effect of Organizational Legitimacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,数字技术给企业发展和创新研究带来新的机遇与挑战,学界呼吁构建新理论解释企业数字创新形成机理。基于资源基础观和制度理论视角,系统分析传统非互联网企业如何通过匹配技术资源(IT能力)和社会属性资源(组织合法性)实现数字化转型以获取数字创新绩效,通过构建理论模型,进一步对275份传统非互联网企业样本进行线性回归分析和Bootstrap分析,并对理论假设进行验证。结果表明:IT能力和应用数字技术进行数字化转型对传统非互联网企业数字创新绩效具有显著正向影响;应用数字技术进行数字化转型对IT能力和数字创新绩效的关系具有中介效应;组织合法性对IT能力、应用数字技术进行数字化转型和数字创新绩效的中介效应具有进一步调节作用。结论说明传统非互联网企业能够利用技术投资构建IT能力以促进数字创新绩效提升,而通过技术资源和具有社会属性的合法性资源匹配实现数字化转型,能够获取更多数字红利。 Digital technology has empowered the overall economy,but there are still many traditional non-Internet enterprises that take conventional production factors as the core driving force.Under the dual influence of global digitalization and COVID-19,enterprises with the organizational development paths relying on non-digitalization are stuck.This paper argues that only by developing information technology capacity and taking digital transformation as well as digital innovation can these enterprises cope with the destructive challenges of digitization and obtain digital dividends.Digital transformation and digital innovation have emerged as emerging research topics in recent years,and most of the existing research focuses on theoretical construction and the exploration of case studies.However,little literature studies the path mechanism of digital transformation and digital innovation,especially since it is still an unexplored research topic for non-IT companies from developing information technology utilization capabilities to obtaining digital innovation performance.Different from Internet companies,many traditional non-Internet firms(non-IT firms in short)mainly rely on follow-up investment to obtain digital resources,but how to effectively use IT resources and obtain digital innovation performance is still a difficult problem for academia and managers in non-Internet firms.Scholars who study technological innovation based on a resource-based view believe that enterprises should take into account social and technological factors in innovation,and excessive bias towards either of the two factors will make enterprises unable to acquire technology.As a result,in order to differentiate themselves from competitors,non-IT firms must effectively match their IT resources and social resources.Existing research has verified the effectiveness of enterprise IT capabilities to localize the development of enterprise information technology resources and improve business process digitization.As a technical factor,IT capability has a certain positive effect on non-IT firms developing IT resources for digital transformation and digital innovation.However,for non-IT firms,a single technical capability cannot ensure that they obtain high digital innovation dividends.The application of digital technologies for digital transformation and digital innovation is undoubtedly a radical organizational change for non-IT firms,and it transcends their traditional organizational action boundaries and brings many challenges such as competitive logic,institutional complexity and legitimacy.The institutional theory believes that any organizational action and operation are subject to social expectations and social identity.Scholars who study the digital transformation of enterprises from the perspective of institutional theory regard the digital transformation of enterprises as the combined effect of several digital innovations,and they believe that these new innovations have brought about changes or substitutions in the organizations and industries.The digital transformation and digital innovation activities of non-IT firms undoubtedly face many legal obstacles,but few studies deeply explore how they can cross the legitimate threshold and obtain digital innovation performance in digitalization,so this paper attempts to open this"black box".By integrating the theories of resource-based view and institutional theory,this study constructs a theoretical model of non-internet firms’IT capability,digital transformation,organizational legitimacy and digital innovation performance.To verify the theoretical model,it further uses linear regression analysis and Bootstrap analysis with 275 samples from non-IT firms.The results show that IT capability and the application of digital technology in digital transformation have a positive impact on these firms’digital innovation performance;digital transformation has a mediating effect on the relationship between IT capability and digital innovation performance;and organizational legitimacy further moderates the mediating effect of digital transformation on IT capability and digital innovation performance.The main contribution of this study is integrating the resource-based view and institutional theory to explore how non-Internet enterprises match their technological resources and social resources to obtain digital innovation performance,while existing literature mostly discusses the different influences of enterprise resources on their digital innovation from a single theoretical perspective.Besides,this paper explores the digitalization process of non-IT firms based on their uniqueness,and combines theoretical and empirical methods to explore how these firms solve the dual obstacles of insufficient technology application ability and social recognition of digital transformation and digital innovation.
作者 叶丹 姚梅芳 葛宝山 赵丽仪 Ye Dan;Yao Meifang;Ge Baoshan;Zhao Liyi(School of Business and Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130015,China)
出处 《科技进步与对策》 北大核心 2023年第11期11-18,共8页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金重大项目(72091310,72091313,72091315) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972083)。
关键词 非IT企业 IT能力 数字化转型 数字创新绩效 组织合法性 Non-Internet Enterprise IT Capability Digital Transformation Digital Innovation Performance Organizational Legitimacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7399
  • 2郑士源,徐辉,王浣尘.网格及网格化管理综述[J].系统工程,2005,23(3):1-7. 被引量:285
  • 3李玉刚,胡君莲.企业战略形成过程的类型及受组织因素影响的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(1):32-37. 被引量:6
  • 4张玉利,杜国臣.创业的合法性悖论[J].中国软科学,2007(10):47-58. 被引量:61
  • 5Andrew F. Hayes.Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium[J]Communication Monographs,2009(4).
  • 6Kristopher J. Preacher,Derek D. Rucker,Andrew F. Hayes.Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions[J].Multivariate Behavioral Research.2007(1)
  • 7Luqiong Tong,Yuhuang Zheng,Ping Zhao.Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice[J].Marketing Letters.2013(2)
  • 8Dawn Iacobucci.Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology.2012(4)
  • 9Loes Janssen,Bob M. Fennis,Ad Th.H. Pruyn.Forewarned is forearmed: Conserving self-control strength to resist social influence[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.2010(6)
  • 10Mario Pandelaere,Barbara Briers,Siegfried Dewitte,Luk Warlop.Better think before agreeing twice[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing.2010(2)

共引文献1364

同被引文献196

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部