期刊文献+

不同治疗方案干预耐药性三叉神经痛有效性与安全性的网状Meta分析 被引量:1

Network Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens intervention for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价不同治疗方案干预耐药性三叉神经痛(TN)的有效性与安全性。方法在线检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、EMBase、Medine、Web of Science、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普网和万方数据知识服务平台数据库中关于不同治疗方案干预耐药TN的随机对照试验(RCTs)。采用Review manager 5.3、Stata MP16和Network软件包对不同治疗方案干预耐药性TN的治疗后即刻有效率、治疗后1年有效率、治疗后3年有效率、并发症发生率进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析。结果共纳入28个RCTs,包括2692例患者,包含7种干预方案:微血管减压术(MVD)、半月神经节射频热凝术(RFT)、经皮穿刺微球囊压迫术(PBC)、经皮半月神经节后根甘油阻滞术(PRGR)、伽玛刀放射外科治疗(GKRS)、半月神经节脉冲射频治疗(PRF)以及RFT联合PRF(RFT+PRF)。其中28项RCTs报告了治疗后即刻有效率及并发症发生率的结果,23项RCTs报告了治疗后1年有效率的结果,16项RCTs报告了治疗后3年有效率的结果。网状Meta分析结果显示,在治疗后即刻有效率方面,RFT+PRF的累积排序概率曲线下面积(SUCRA)排名最高,其次是MVD、RFT、PBC、PRGR、PRF和GKRS。在治疗后1年有效率方面,MVD的SUCRA值排名最高,其次是RFT+PRF、RFT、PBC、GKRS、PRGR和PRF。在治疗后3年有效率方面,MVD的SUCRA值排名最高,其次是RFT+PRF、RFT、PBC、GKRS、PRGR和PRF。在并发症发生率方面,PRGR的SUCRA值排名最高,其次是MVD、PBC、RFT、RFT+PRF、GKRS和PRF。结论在上述干预耐药性TN的治疗方案中,MVD可能为治疗后1年有效率及治疗后3年有效率最高的方案;RFT+PRF可能为治疗后即刻有效率最高的方案;PRF可能为并发症发生率最低的方案。临床工作中,应考虑患者的实际情况,合理的选择治疗方案,以期让患者取得最满意的治疗效果。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for intervention of drugresistant Trigeminal neuralgia(TN).Methods Online search PubMed,the Cochrane Library,EMBase,Medine,Web of Science,CNKI,China Biology Medicine disc,VIP databases and Wanfang Data for RCTs of different treatment regimens for drug-resistant TN.Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3,Stata MP16,and network packages on the efficiency after treatment,efficiency of 1 year after treatment,efficiency of 3 years after treatment,and complication rate after treatment of different treatment options for drug-resistant TN.Results A total of 28 RCTs with 2692 patients were included,which contained 7 types of intervention options:microvascular decompression(MVD),radiofrequency thermocoagulation(RFT),percutaneous balloon compression(PBC),percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizolysis(PRGR),Gamma knife radiosurgery(GKRS),pulsed radiofrequency(PRF),and RFT plus PRF(RFT+PRF).Of these,28 RCTs reported the results of the efficiency after treatment and the complication rate after treatment,23 RCTs reported the results of the efficiency of 1 year after treatment,and 16 RCTs reported the results of the efficiency of 3 years after treatment.Network meta-analysis results showed that,at postoperative efficiency,RFT+PRF showed the best surface under cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA)scores,followed by MVD,RFT,PBC,PRGR,PRF and GKRS.At the efficiency of 1 year after treatment,MVD showed the best SUCRA scores,followed by RFT+PRF,RFT,PBC,GKRS,PRGR and PRF.At the efficiency of 3 years after treatment,MVD showed the best SUCRA scores,followed by RFT+PRF,RFT,PBC,GKRS,PRGR and PRF.At the complication rate after treatment,PRGR showed the best SUCRA scores,followed by MVD,PBC,RFT,RFT+PRF,GKRS and PRF.Conclusions In the above treatment scheme of interfering with drug-resistant TN,MVD may be the most effective treatment scheme 1 year after treatment and 3 years after treatment;RFT+PRF may be the most effective scheme after treatment;PRF may be the treatment with the lowest incidence of complications.In clinical work,we should also consider the actual situation of patients and reasonably choose the treatment scheme,in order to make patients achieve the most satisfactory treatment effect.
作者 邱志强 钟向凯 杨麒民 孙白瑾涛 周慧玲 徐晓雪 QIU Zhi-qiang;ZHONG Xiang-kai;YANG Qi-min(Department of Radiology,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,China)
出处 《临床神经病学杂志》 CAS 2023年第2期90-98,共9页 Journal of Clinical Neurology
基金 四川省教育厅重点项目(18ZA0216)。
关键词 耐药性三叉神经痛 网状Meta分析 有效性 安全性 治疗方案 drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia network Meta-analysis efficacy safety treatment regimen
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献61

  • 1韩武,王亚明,张剑宁,董超,皇甫罗锴,高晓红.微血管减压术与伽玛刀治疗原发性三叉神经痛疗效的Meta分析[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2020,0(2):62-67. 被引量:11
  • 2于炎冰,张黎,徐晓利,马延山.显微血管减压术后复发三叉神经痛的手术治疗[J].中华神经外科杂志,2006,22(9):538-540. 被引量:53
  • 3Van Zundert J, Brat)ant S, Van de Kelft E, et al. Pulsed ra- diofrequency treatment of the Gasserian ganglion in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Pain, 2003, 104 (3): 449--452.
  • 4Castro M, Vila S, Canovas L, et ah Pnlsed radiofrequency: an effective alternative for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Eur J Pain, 2006, 10 (S1): S136.
  • 5Erdine~ S.-Ozyalein NS, Cimen A, et "ah Comparison of pulsed radiofrequeney with conventional radiofrequeney in the treat- ment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Eur .l Pain, 2007, 11 (3): 309--313.
  • 6International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edithion. http://ihs-classificatinn. org/en/02_klassifikation/04_leil3/13.01.01 _facialpain.html.
  • 7Kanpolat Y, Savas A, Bekar A, et al. Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idio- pathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1600 pa- tients[J]. Neurosurgery, 2001, 48(3): 524--534.
  • 8Broggi G, Ferrali P, Franzini A. Treatment strategy for trigem- inal neuralgia: a thirty years experience[J]. Neurol Sci, 2008, 29(suppl 1): S79-82.
  • 9Bogduk N. Pulsed radiofrequency[J]. Pain Med, 2006, 7(5): 396-407.
  • 10Cohen SP, Foster A. Pulsed radiofrequency as a treatment for groin pain and orchialgia[J]. Urology, 2003, 61(3): 645.

共引文献41

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部