期刊文献+

中文版积极元认知元情绪问卷的修订及在乳腺癌病人中的信效度检验 被引量:1

Revision of the Chinese version of Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta⁃Emotions Questionnaire and its reliability and validity test in breast cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:修订中文版积极元认知元情绪问卷(PMCEQ),并检验其在乳腺癌病人中的应用信效度。方法:依据Brisilin原则对PMCEQ进行翻译、回译和跨文化调试后,形成中文版PMCEQ。选取西安市2所三级甲等医院457例乳腺癌病人进行问卷调查,评价中文版PMCEQ的信效度。结果:中文版PMCEQ包括3个维度,共18个条目。量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.983,条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.900~1.000。总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.827,3个维度的Cronbach’sα系数为0.649~0.799,总量表折半信度为0.886。结论:中文版PMCEQ具有较好的信效度,可用于测量乳腺癌病人在面对癌症情况下的适应性元认知信念。 Objective:To translate and revise Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta-Emotions Questionnaire(PMCEQ),and to test its reliability and validity in breast cancer patients.Methods:The Chinese version of PMCEQ was formed through translation,back translation,and cross-cultural adaptation based on Brislin principles.The reliability and validity of Chinese version of PMCEQ were tested by means of questionaire among 457 breast cancer patients from 2 tertiary grade A hospitals in Xi'an.Results:The Chinese version of PMCEQ included 3 dimensions and 18 items.The item-content validity index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.900 to 1.000,and the average of scale-content validity index(S-CVI/Ave)was 0.983.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient was 0.827,and the Cronbach'sαcoefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.649 to 0.799.The split-half reliability was 0.886.Conclusion:The Chinese version of PMCEQ had good reliability and validity,which could be used to measure adaptive metacognitive beliefs in breast cancer patients facing cancer situations.
作者 张慧芳 林子涵 李天姿 吴文斌 李津 ZHANG Huifang;LIN Zihan;LI Tianzi;WU Wenbin;LI Jin(Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center,Shaanxi 710000 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2023年第11期1892-1897,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 积极元认知 乳腺癌 信度 效度 positive metacognitions breast cancer reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

共引文献141

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部