“金课”评估问卷的编制及其应用--以《认知心理学》为例

Development and Application of“Golden Course”Assessment Questionnaire

依据“两性一度”金课标准编制课程质量评估问卷,并用该问卷对认知心理学课程改革效果进行评估。方法:确定问卷的理论框架,建立各维度题目并形成初始问卷。选取某高校76名主修课程的本科生测试,进行项目分析、探索性因素分析;对135名主修课程的本科生进行测试,进行验证性因素分析、信度分析;以问卷分数为因变量,对教学改革班与非教学改革班进行独立样本t检验,以检验课程改革效果。结果:正式问卷共包含13个题目,包括教学方式改革、课程考核改革、高阶性、挑战度四个因子。教改班和非教改班在教学方式、考核方式、挑战度改革上存在差异,但在高阶性维度差异不显著。结论:问卷可以用于评估课程质量;课程改革在教学方式、考核方式改革、挑战度改革是有效的,未来教学需要加强理论与实践的结合,培养学生解决复杂问题的能力。

Background:According to“High level,Innovation and Challenging”,we compiled a course evaluation questionnaire,and used it to evaluate the effect of cognitive psychology teaching reform.Method:First,we determined the framework of the questionnaire,to establish each dimension and form the initial questionnaire.Then,we tested 76 undergraduate students who majored in courses in a university to carry out item analysis and exploratory factor analysis;A confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were conducted on 135 undergraduate students;Taking the scores of the questionnaire as the dependent variable,the independent sample t-test was conducted for the teaching reform class and the non-teaching reform class to test the effect of course reform.Result:The final questionnaire contained 13 questions,including four factors:teaching method reform,course assessment reform,high level,and challenge.The model was well-fitted and reliable.There were significant differences in teaching method,assessment method,and challenge between the teaching reform classes and non-teaching reform classes,but the difference in high level was not significant.Conclusion:This questionnaire can be used to evaluate the quality of courses;The reform is effective in teaching methods,assessment methods,and challenge.In the future,teaching needs to strengthen the combination of theory and practice to cultivate students’ability to solve complex problems.