认罪认罚案件中的无罪辩护

On the Not Guilty Defense in the Case of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment

认罪认罚从宽制度有“协商式司法模式”之称,在认罪认罚案件的司法实践中仍有辩护律师从事实认定、法律适用与证据规则适用等层面作无罪辩护。事实认定的准确性、罪刑法定原则与无罪推定原则构成了此类无罪辩护的正当性基础,认罪认罚制度的包容性、辩护人的有限独立地位及职业伦理、防范冤假错案的需求以及形成多元辩护合力的需要也为其提供了合理空间。律师在此类案件中作无罪辩护时应注重辩护意见的有效性,确保辩护策略形成的协同性。公检法等国家机关应当尊重和保障认罪认罚案件中的律师无罪辩护。

The leniency system for guilty plea and punishment is known as the“consultative judicial model”.However,in the judicial practice of guilty plea and punishment cases,there are still defense lawyers who defend their innocence from the aspects of fact determination,lawapplication and evidence rulesapplication.The accuracy of fact determination,the principle of legality for a crime and the principle of presumption of innocence constitute the legitimate basis of such innocence defense.The inclusiveness of the system of confession and punishment,the limited independent status and professional ethics of the defender,the need to prevent the unjust,false and wrong cases,and the need to form a multiple defense force also provide a reasonable space for it.Lawyers should pay attention to the validity of defense opinions and ensure the synergy of defense strategies when defending innocence in such cases.Public security organs,procuratorial organs,peolpe’s courts and other state organs should respect and guarantee the innocence of lawyers in cases of confession and punishment.