期刊文献+

税收情报自动交换下我国纳税人权利保护问题研究

Research on the Protection of Taxpayers'Rights in China under the Automatic Exchange of Information on Tax Matters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 税收情报交换有力遏制和打击国际逃避税等非法行为,但也意味着税收征管权的扩张和对纳税人权利的限制。税务机关和金融机构在收集和共享涉税信息时应充分保障纳税人所享有的信息保密权、参与权和救济权。目前我国对纳税人权利保护规定有所缺失且不完善,大部分为原则性规则,可操作性不强,无法将其落到实处。对此,应借鉴其他国家税收立法的经验,完善我国纳税人实体性和程序性权利的规定,健全责任追究机制,增设信息监督制度。
作者 李雅瑜 Li Yayu
出处 《湖南税务高等专科学校学报》 2023年第3期34-42,共9页 Journal of Hunan Taxation College
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献67

  • 1廖益新,冯小川.强制性仲裁并非解决国际税收争议问题的灵丹妙药[J].税务研究,2020,0(2):59-65. 被引量:12
  • 2Cesar Gil Hernandez. Trends in the Exchange of Rele- vant Tax Information[M] . Tax Treaty Policy and Development. Linde Verlag Wien Ges. M. B. 2005:511.
  • 3R. Murphy, Closing the European Gap, A Report for Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists & Democrats in the European Parliament, Tax Research LLP 2 (2012).
  • 4A. Brodzka, S. Garufi, The Era of Exchange of Information and Fiscal Transparency: The Use of Soft Law Instruments and the Enhancement of Good Governance in Tax Matters, 52 EUROPEAN TAXATION, IBFD 397 (2012).
  • 5OECD, Tax Transparency 2012 Report on Progress, Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes 50 (2012).
  • 6D. Spencer, Exchange of Tax Information, 5(1) ACCOUNTANCY BUSINESS AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST 92 (2006).
  • 7E. M. Poptcheva, A FA TCA for the EU? Data Protection Aspects ofA utomatic Exchange of Bank Information, Library Briefing of the European Parliament 2 (May 27, 2013).
  • 8M. Pogroszewska, Fiskusypodziela sie danymi, RZECZPOSPOLITA (Apr. 13, 2012).
  • 9A. Brodzka, The Road to FA TCA in European Union, 53(10) EUROPEAN TAXATION, IBFD 517 (2013).
  • 10J. O'Donnell and J. Strupczewski, Six Largest Members Agree to Fight Tax Havens, REUTERS (Apr. 12, 2013).

共引文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部