期刊文献+

基于最大均值差异测度的装配体相似性研究 被引量:1

Assembly similarity stady based on the maximum mean discrepancy measure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于距离的装配体相似性度量方法由于忽略了对距离分布的分析,在其案例初筛过程中,采用该方法时易导致丢失部分相似的案例。针对这一问题,提出了一种基于最大均值差异(MMD)的装配体相似性度量方法。首先,利用装配体中零部件数量及零部件类型数量、连接数量及连接类型数量,共4个参数,将装配体模型化为一维数据集合;然后,使用最大均值差异(MMD)算法,将表示装配体模型的一维数组映射到再生核希尔伯特空间(RKHS),在该空间内计算出装配体间的距离,并利用离散系数对距离进行了统计学分析;最后,通过基于实例的实验和基于装配体参数生成规则的仿真比较实验对其进行了验证。实验及研究结果表明:在准确度上,MMD算法与欧氏距离(ED)和加权距离(WD)算法一致;在鲁棒性上,无论进行相似性分析的两装配体零部件数量是否一致,该方法的距离分布在零部件数量超过6个后即可达到基本稳定,最高离散系数约为WD算法的23%,距离分布的鲁棒性有了较大程度的增强。 To address the problem that the distance-based assembly similarity metric ignores the analysis of the distribution of distance,which can easily lead to the loss of some similar cases during the initial screening of cases,an assembly similarity metric based on the maximum mean discrepancy(MMD)was proposed.Firstly,the assembly was modeled as a one-dimensional data set using four parameters,such as the number of parts and the number of part types,the number of couplings and the number of coupling types in the assembly.Then,the one-dimensional array representing the assembly model was mapped to the reproducing kernel Hilbert space(RKHS)using the maximum mean discrepancy(MMD)algorithm,in which the distances between assemblies were calculated and the distance was statistically analyzed using discrete coefficients.Finally,it was verified by case-based experiments and simulation comparison experiments based on assembly parameter generation rules.The experimental and research results show that MMD algorithm is consistent with Euclidean distance(ED)and weighted distance(WD)algorithms in accuracy;from the perspective of robustness,regardless of the number of parts of the two assemblies for similarity analysis,the distance distribution of the method is basically stable after the number of parts exceeding six,and the highest dispersion coefficient is about 23%of the WD algorithm,which improves the robustness of the distance distribution is greatly enhanced.
作者 张鵾 魏树国 周妍 疏淑丽 李博 ZHANG Kun;WEI Shu-guo;ZHOU Yan;SHU Shu-li;LI Bo(College of Mechanical Engineering,Tongling university,Tongling 244061,China;Key Laboratory of Construction Hydraulic Robots of Anhui Higher Education Institutes,Tongling 244061,China;New Copper-based Material Industry Generic Technology Research Center of Anhui Province,Tongling 244061,China;School of Electrical Engineering,Tongling university,Tongling 244061,China)
出处 《机电工程》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第6期867-874,共8页 Journal of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering
基金 安徽省高校自然科学重点研究项目(KJ2021A1060) 铜陵学院校级科研项目(2021TLXY18) 铜陵学院大学生科研基金资助项目(2021TLXYDXS088)。
关键词 装配体模型 装配体相似性 再生核希尔伯特空间 最大均值差异 欧氏距离 加权距离 离散系数 assembly model assembly similarity reproducing kernel Hilbert space(RKHS) maximum mean discrepancy(MMD) Euclidean distance(ED) weighted distance(WD) discrete coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1彭培林,陈刚,李原,张开富.基于实例的装配顺序规划技术研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(23):2121-2125. 被引量:6
  • 2陈刚,杨海成.复杂产品装配实例表示技术研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(5):652-655. 被引量:1
  • 3Swaminathan A. An Experience Based Assembly Sequence Planner of Mechanical Assembly. IEEE Trans on Robotics and Automation, 1996,12(2):252-267.
  • 4Shao L, Zhu F, Li X. Transfer learning for visual categorization: A survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2014, 26(5): 1019-1034.
  • 5Jia C, Kong Y, Ding Z, et al. Latent tensor transfer learning for RGB-D action recognition[C]//Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York, NJ, USA: ACM, 2014: 87-96.
  • 6Perlich C, Dalessandro B, Raeder T, et al. Machine learning for targeted display advertising: Transfer learning in action[J]. Machine Learning, 2014, 95(1): 103-127.
  • 7Zhuang F, Luo P, Xiong H, et al. Exploiting associations between word clusters and document classes for cross-domain text categorization[J]. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, 2011, 4(1): 100-114.
  • 8Dai W, Xue G R, Yang Q, et al. Co-clustering based classification for out-of-domain documents[C]//Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. New York, NJ, USA: ACM, 2007: 210-219.
  • 9Zhou J T, Pan S J, Tsang I W, et al. Hybrid heterogeneous transfer learning through deep learning[C]//Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI, 2014: 2213-2219.
  • 10Yang P, Gao W. Multi-view discriminant transfer learning[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI, 2013: 1848-1854.

共引文献16

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部