摘要
学业质量标准是学生在完成各学段基础教育时应该具备的基本素养及其应该达到的具体水平的明确界定和描述。从框架内容和水平划分两方面对中澳两国高中数学学业质量标准中的具体内容进行比较,通过词频分析发现两国高中数学学业质量标准在框架结构和内容要素上既有共性,也有差异。在形容词、名词和动词的词性分析水平划分上各具特色:从形容词词频统计得出,ACM8.4和《标准》均以“合适”描述刻画,ACM8.4各水平以常规与非常规情境划分;从名词词频统计得出,ACM8.4和《标准》均注重问题解决与模型思想,ACM8.4各水平均体现对信息技术的考查;从动词词频统计得出,ACM8.4和《标准》均明确界定刻画描述术语,ACM8.4术语明确定义并进行规范化处理。中国在未来数学学业质量标准的水平内容设计上可适当借鉴澳大利亚学业质量标准的研制经验,如明确阐述相关术语的使用与涵义;细化不同情境与内容标准的联系;重视信息技术与各个水平的融合等。
The academic quality standard is a clear definition and description of the basic literacy that students should have and the specific level they should achieve when they complete the basic education of each stage.From the perspective of frame content and level division,the specific content in the high school mathematics academic quality standards is compared,and the design ideas and arrangement characteristics of the Chinese and Australian high school mathematics academic quality standards are compared through word frequency analysis.It is found that the framework structure and content of the two There are commonalities and differences in the elements,and they also have their own characteristics in the level of part-of-speech analysis of adjectives,nouns and verbs,mainly including:from the adjective word frequency statistics,ACM8.4 Each level is divided into conventional and unconventional situations;from the statistics of noun word frequency,ACM8.4 and the"Standard"both focus on problem solving and model thinking,and each level of ACM8.4 reflects information technology examination;from the statistics of verb word frequency ACM8.4 and the"Standard"both clearly define and describe terms,and ACM8.4 terms are clearly defined for standardization.In the design of the level content of the future mathematics academic quality standards,China can appropriately learn from the Australian academic quality standards development experience:clarify the use and meaning of relevant terms;refine the connection between different situations and content standards;pay attention to the integration of information technology and various levels.
作者
吴佳敏
吴红德
林子植
WU Jia-min;WU Hong-de;LIN Zi-zhi(School of Mathematics and Computer Science,Jiangxi Normal University of Science and Technology,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330000,China)
出处
《教学研究》
2023年第3期38-43,52,共7页
Research in Teaching
基金
2022年全国教育科学“十四五”规划教育部重点课题(DHA220399)
2022年江西省教育科学“十四五”规划重点课题(22ZD031)
2022年江西科技师范大学研究生创新专项课题(YC2022-X41)。
关键词
学业质量标准
框架内容
水平划分
词频分析
academic quality standards
framework content
level division
word frequency analysis