五臣李善王逸三家序“骚”之比较——《文选·骚》五臣李善二家注比较研究之二

On the Comparison of Five Ministers and Li Shan’s Sao Prelude with Wang Yi’s——A Comparative Study of Five Ministers and Li Shan’s Interpretations of the part Sao of Wen Xuan Ⅱ

《文选》“骚类”的各序/解题,李善注的乃节录王逸《楚辞章句》相应之序文而冠以“序曰”,“五臣注”的则虽“另起炉灶”而实多暗袭《楚辞章句》相应序文以为之,二者多有不同。五臣、李善二家注均往往漏了王逸序文之精华而有所未逮乃至大为逊色,尤其是李氏的。合观序注,可知李善节去《离骚经序》的“《离骚》之文,依《诗》取兴”以下文字,与其是否欲“摆脱文学依附经学”如何毫无关系。将五臣李善二家序“骚”与王逸《楚辞章句》相应序文作比较研究,对深入了解五臣李善二家对相关作品的整体把握如何,有着不可替代的特殊意义。这一点,向为学界所忽略。

As every preludes/topic explanation of the part Sao of Wen Xuan,Li Shan’s interpretations extracted corresponding preface of Wang Yi’s the Songs of Chu Chapters and Sentence and named it prelude saying,while five ministers actually lifted the Songs of Chu Chapters and Sentence in secret though making a fresh start.As a result,there are many different of them.However,neither of them skimmed the cream of Wang Yi’s preface or as well as it,and even be much inferior to it,especially Li Shan’s.Combined with all of them,there is nothing to weather Li Shan wanted to get rid of literature and depended on the study of Confucian classics or not,when he cut out the following words of Li Sao Jing Xu that Li Sao depended on The Book of Song to select to be roused.There is irreplaceable and special meaning by comparative study both five ministers and Li San’s preface of part Sao with Wang Yi’s the Songs of Chu Chapters and Sentence when penetrating into five ministers and Li Shan’s how to overall grasp related works,which the academia always neglects of.