监察法与刑法从宽规定的衔接问题研究

Study on the Connection of Leniency Provisions Between Supervision Law and Criminal Law

监察法出台后关于认罪认罚从宽处罚规定相较于刑事诉讼法中的规定而言具有新的独特内涵,具体表现为超越刑事诉讼法认罪认罚范畴的“主动认罪认罚+四种从宽情节”,其中监察法中的从宽新规定与刑法的从宽量刑情节的衔接也成为突出问题。《监察法》第31条与刑法自首、坦白、立功以及特别从宽规定存在规范上的非一致性,基于监察法的宪法性法律地位以及认罪认罚从宽制度的理论定位,需要通过刑法修正及相关司法解释给予精确化、科学化的认定,从而保证监察法与刑法在从宽规定方面达到协调一致与规范运行。

Compared with the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Law,the provisions on lenient punishment for guilty plea have new unique connotation after the Supervision Law has been issued,embodied in"active guilty plea+four lenient circumstances"beyond the category of guilty plea in the Criminal Procedure Law.Among them,the connection between the new provisions on leniency in the Supervision Law and the lenient circumstances in the Criminal Law has also become a prominent problem.There is normative inconsistency between Article 31 of the Supervision Law and the provisions of Criminal Law on surrender,confession,service and special leniency.Based on the constitutional legal status of the Supervision Law and the theoretical positioning of leniency system of guilty plea,it is necessary to give accurate and scientific identification through the amendment of the criminal law and relevant judicial interpretation,so as to ensure the coordinated and standardized operation of the supervision law and the Criminal Law in lenient provisions.