摘要
在经济高质量发展的新时代,厘清绿色金融对经济高质量发展的影响,对于进一步提高经济发展质量而言至关重要。本文选取了2007一2017年30个省的年份数据,通过实证分析检验了绿色金融对经济高质量发展的影响。首先,基准回归结果表明绿色金融促进了经济高质量发展,与稳健性检验的回归结果是一致的。其次,选用空间计量模型检验了绿色金融对经济高质量发展的空间外溢性,发现绿色金融对其他地区经济高质量发展存在影响,证实了空间外溢性的存在。再次,进行了地区异质性检验,发现绿色金融对经济高质量发展的影响在东部和中部地区均不显著,但在西部地区显著为正。最后,本文进行了分位数回归,结果表明绿色金融对经济高质量发展的影响存在非线性关系。结合研究结论,本文建议应继续提高绿色金融发展水平,充分发挥其对经济高质量发展的促进作用。
In the period of high-quality economic development,it is very important to clarify the impact of green finance on high-quality economic development.This paper selects the annual data of 30 provinces from 2007 to 2017,and tests the impact of green finance on high-quality economic development through empirical analysis.Firstly,the basic regression results show that green finance promotes high-quality economic development,which is consistent with the regression results of robustness test.Secondly,the spatial econometric model is used to test the spatial spillover of green finance on high-quality economic development.It is found that green finance has an impact on high-quality economic development in other regions,which confirms the existence of spatial spillover.Thirdly,through the regional heterogeneity test,it is found that the impact of green finance on high-quality economic development is not significant in the eastern and central regions,but it is significantly positive in the western region.Finally,the quantile regression is carried out.The results show that there is a nonlinear relationship between the impact of green finance on high-quality economic development.Based on the conclusions of this paper,this paper suggests that we should continue to improve the development level of green finance in order to promote high-quality economic development.
作者
华怡婷
石宝峰
HUA Yi-ting;SHI Bao-feng(College of Economics and Management,Northwest A&F University,Yangling 712100,China)
出处
《工程管理科技前沿》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期90-96,共7页
Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71873103)。
关键词
绿色金融
经济高质量发展
全要素生产率增长率
green finance
high-quality economic development
total factor productivity growth rate