期刊文献+

道德物化的科技伦理进路及其新拓展——基于科技审度观的分析 被引量:5

Moralizing Technology as an Approach to Ethics of Science and Technology and its New Development:A Reconsideration
原文传递
导出
摘要 荷兰学派“道德物化”思想旨在通过技术人工物的设计、使用和流行来说服人按照道德期待去行动。近来,这一技术哲学思想在科技伦理治理中产生了广泛影响,同时也遭遇几个方面的挑战:一是“道德物化”可能给工程师过度赋权,导致技治主义,剥夺人的自由;二是“道德物化”主要考察单个技术人工物对人的影响,没能考察科技系统的价值敏感性问题;三是“道德物化”仅考虑技术人工物在使用环节的价值问题,未能考察科技作为一种工具在生产环节的价值内嵌问题。“科技审度”观肯定了科技对生产力的促进作用,但对科技异化保持审慎态度,并将科技置于人的解放中进行反思与批评。从科技审度视角来审视“道德物化”,将助其应对以上挑战,进一步拓展其科技伦理内涵。科技审度视野下的道德物化科技伦理考察将从单个的技术产品拓展到科技系统,从消费环节上溯到生产环节,以便充分考量科技的价值敏感性,进而实现全面、敏捷且有效的科技伦理治理。 The“Moralizing Technology”theory proposed by the Dutch school scholars aims to persuade people to act by morality through designing,using,and promoting technological artifactsThis idea has gained its population in China and abroad but is also confronted by three main kinds of criticism:First,it may overempower engineers,leading to technocracy and depriving people of their freedomSecond,Moralizing Technology mainly examines the effects of individual technological artifacts and fails to address the sensibility of value embedded in technological systemsThird,the moralizing technology approach only considers the value sensitivity of technological artifacts when they are used,failing to examine how it is carried out in manufacturingThe view of reconsideration affirms the role of science and technology in promoting productive forces but remains cautious toward the alienation of science and technologyIt also places science and technology in the context of human liberationThe Marxian reconsideration view of science and technology helps meet previous challenges,deepens our understanding of moralizing technology,and expands its study from individual technological artifacts to technological systems and from consumption to the phase of productionCombining Marx\s view with moralizing technology will further our understanding of the value sensitivity of science and technology crucial for ethical governance.
作者 王小伟 WANG Xiaowei(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China)
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 北大核心 2023年第3期178-185,共8页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 北京市社会科学基金重点项目“‘道德物化’技术伦理思想研究”(21ZXA001)阶段性成果。
关键词 科技审度 马克思 道德物化 科技伦理 Reconsideration of Science and Technology Marx Moralizing technology Ethics of Science and Technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1Richard H. Thaler, and Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale University Press, 2008, p. 4.
  • 2Bruno Latour, "Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts", In Shaping Technology/Building Society, MIT Press, 1992, p. 166, p. 152.
  • 3Peter-Paul Verbeek, Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things, The University of Chicago Press, 2011, p. 212, p. m, p. 90, p. 21.
  • 4Andrew Feenberg, Peter-Paul Verbeek, "Review of What Things Do", In Human Studies, 2009, 32 (2), pp. 225 - 228.
  • 5Peter-Paul Verbeek, What Things Do : Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, University Park : The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005, p. 196, pp. 219 - 222.
  • 6Robert Frodeman, "Experiments in Field Philosophy", New York Times, the opinion page, 2010 - 11 - 23. http: // opinionator, blogs.'nytimes, com/2010/11/23/experiments-in-field-philosophy/.
  • 7Batya Friedman, etc. , "Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods", UW CSE Technical Report 2002 -12 -01.
  • 8B. J. Fogg, Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
  • 9Dan Lockton, etc. , "The Design with Intent Method: A Design Tool for Influencing User Behaviour", In Applied Ergonomics, 2010, 41 (3), pp. 382-392.
  • 10泰勒、桑斯坦:《助推:事关健康、财富与快乐的最佳选择》,刘宁译,中信出版社,2009,第v页;第vi页.

共引文献80

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部