期刊文献+

2013年与2019年我国育龄夫妇孕前健康风险检出率的对比分析 被引量:1

Comparison of the detection rates of preconception health risks among Chinese couples of reproductive age in 2013 and 2019
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比分析2013年与2019年我国育龄夫妇孕前健康风险检出率。方法本研究为横断面研究,连续选取2013年或2019年参加“国家免费孕前优生健康检查项目”的9153916对20~49岁育龄夫妇的孕前健康检查资料,评估育龄女性孕前8类健康风险(遗传风险、生殖风险、慢性病风险、感染风险、营养风险、行为风险、环境风险、社会心理风险)暴露情况,以及育龄男性除生殖风险外的7类孕前健康风险暴露情况。采用t检验和χ^(2)检验比较育龄夫妇人口学特征差异,计算各类孕前健康风险检出率及95%CI,采用χ^(2)检验比较风险检出率差异。结果2019年我国育龄夫妇中年龄≥35岁、高中及以上学历、工人、户籍性质为非农业者比例均显著高于2013年(15.18%比6.22%、52.12%比29.78%、8.33%比7.17%、12.39%比6.64%),农民比例显著低于2013年(60.95%比76.87%)(均P<0.001)。2013年我国育龄女性检出率最高的3类风险是营养风险(37.50%)、感染风险(16.95%)和社会心理风险(11.62%),2019年检出率最高的3类风险是营养风险(38.07%)、感染风险(12.82%)和慢性病风险(11.12%)。2019年育龄女性营养风险检出率显著高于2013年(38.07%比37.50%),感染风险和社会心理风险检出率均显著低于2013年(12.82%比16.95%、7.37%%比11.62%)(均P<0.001)。2013年育龄男性检出率最高的3类风险是行为风险(44.87%)、营养风险(36.81%)和社会心理风险(13.43%),2019年检出率最高的3类风险是营养风险(45.47%)、行为风险(38.76%)和社会心理风险(9.18%)。2019年育龄男性营养风险检出率显著高于2013年(45.47%比36.81%),行为风险和社会心理风险检出率均显著低于2013年(38.76%比44.87%、9.18%比13.43%)(均P<0.001)。结论2019年我国育龄夫妇营养风险及男性遗传风险检出率较2013年有所升高,其他孕前健康风险暴露呈下降趋势;营养风险、感染风险、社会心理风险和慢性病风险为育龄女性当前主要风险,营养风险、行为风险和社会心理风险为育龄男性当前主要风险。 Objective To assess the detection rates of preconception health risks among couples of reproductive age in China and analyze the differences between 2013 and 2019.Methods In this cross-sectional study,the preconception health examination data of 9153916 couples of 20-49 years who participated in the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project in 2013 or 2019 were consecutively selected.The health risks involved eight aspects in women(genetic risk,reproductive risk,chronic disease risk,infectious risk,nutritional risk,behavioral risk,environmental risk and psychosocial risk)and seven aspects in men except for reproductive risks were assessed.The t test and χ^(2) test were used to compare the differences in demographic characteristics between the couples of reproductive age.The detection rates and 95%CI of each preconception health risk were calculated and the χ^(2) test was used to compare the differences in the detection rates of risk factors.Results In 2019,the proportion of couples of reproductive age in China who were 35 years or older,had an education background of high school and above,workers,and held non-agricultural registered residence were all higher than those in 2013(15.18%vs 6.22%,52.12%vs 29.78%,8.33%vs 7.17%,12.39%vs 6.64%),while the proportion of farmers was significantly lower than that in 2013(60.95%vs 76.87%)(all P<0.001).In 2013,the three health risks with the highest detection rate among Chinese women of reproductive age was nutritional risk(37.50%),infectious risk(16.95%)and psychosocial risk(11.62%),respectively;while in 2019,it was nutritional risk(38.07%),infectious risk(12.82%),and chronic disease risk(11.12%),respectively.The detection rate of nutritional risk in Chinese women of reproductive age in 2019 was significantly higher than that in 2013(38.07%vs 37.50%),while the detection rates of infectious risk and psychosocial risk were both lower than those in 2013(12.82%vs 16.95%and 7.37%vs 11.62%)(all P<0.001).In 2013,the top three risks detected in men of reproductive age was behavioral risk(44.87%),nutritional risk(36.81%)and psychosocial risk(13.43%),respectively;and in 2019,it was nutritional risk(45.47%),behavioral risk(38.76%)and psychosocial risk(9.18%),respectively.The detection rates of nutritional risk in men of reproductive age in 2019 was significantly higher than that in 2013(45.47%vs 36.81%),while the detection rates of behavioral risk and psychosocial risk were both lower than those in 2013(38.76%vs 44.87%,9.18%vs 13.43%)(all P<0.001).Conclusions The detection rate of nutritional risk in couples of reproductive age and genetic risk in men in 2019 in China are higher than those in 2013,and the exposure to the other preconception health risks is decreasing.The nutritional risk,infection risk,psychosocial risk and chronic disease risk are the main risk factors for women of reproductive age,while the nutritional risk,behavioral risk and psychosocial risk are the main risk factors for men.
作者 董婧 吴申鹏 李慧敏 马旭 贺媛 Dong Jing;Wu Shenpeng;Li Huimin;Ma Xu;He Yuan(National Research Institute for Family Planning,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《中华健康管理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2023年第6期405-411,共7页 Chinese Journal of Health Management
基金 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000102) 河南省重点研发与推广专项(JBKY2021007)。
关键词 育龄女性 育龄男性 孕前保健 健康风险 Women of reproductive age Men of reproductive age Preconception care Health risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1罗家有.我国出生缺陷干预的现状与发展趋势[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(2):458-460. 被引量:101
  • 2李新虎,王劲峰,郑晓瑛,张科利.出生缺陷发生的环境因素研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2005,21(10):1158-1160. 被引量:21
  • 3周凤荣,陈志欣,张蓬,何守森,王锡鲁,刘秀君.山东省围产儿出生缺陷危险因素的病例对照研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2005,13(5):398-400. 被引量:42
  • 4中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006--2020年)[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部.中国出生缺陷防治报告[R].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2012.
  • 6卫生部妇幼卫生司,中国出生缺陷监测中心.中国出生缺陷监测工作手册[Z],1995.
  • 7Banta D.The development of health technology assessment[J].Health Policy,2003,63(2):121-132.
  • 8中华人民共和国国家人口和计划生育委员会.国家人口计生委财政部关于开展国家免费孕前优生健康检查项目试点工作的通知[EB/OL].(2010-04-22)[2014-11.15].http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/fys/s3589/201307/tSefadcb2dca4f418cbc0988eOfdd21b.shtml.
  • 9CDC's roadmap for preconception health care[ J]. Lancet,2006, 367 ( 9525 ) : 1792.
  • 10Yoon PW, Rasmussen SA, Lynberg MC, et al. 2001. The National Birth Defects Prevention Study [ J ]. Public Health Rep, 2001,116 Suppl 1:32-40.

共引文献108

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部