摘要
We observed several patients presenting 2-[^(18)F]FDG uptake in the reactive axillary lymph node at PET/CT imaging,ipsilateral to the site of the COVID-19 vaccine injection.Analog finding was documented at[^(18)F]Choline PET/CT.The aim of our study was to describe this source of false positive cases.All patients examined by PET/CT were included in the study.Data concerning patient anamnesis,laterality,and time interval from recent COVID-19 vaccination were recorded.SUVmax was measured in all lymph nodes expressing tracer uptake after vaccination.Among 712 PET/CT scans with 2-[^(18)F]FDG,104 were submitted to vaccination;89/104 patients(85%)presented axillary and/or deltoid tracer uptake,related to recent COVID-19 vaccine administration(median from injection:11 days).The mean SUVmax of these findings was 2.1(range 1.6–3.3).Among 89 patients with false positive axillary uptake,36 subjects had received chemotherapy due to lymph node metastases from somatic cancer or lymphomas,prior to the scan:6/36 patients with lymph node metastases showed no response to therapy or progression disease.The mean SUVmax value of lymph nodal localizations of somatic cancers/lymphomas after chemotherapy was 7.8.Only 1/31 prostate cancer patients examined by[^(18)F]Choline PET/CT showed post-vaccine axillary lymph node uptake.These findings were not recorded at PET/CT scans with[^(18)F]-6-FDOPA,[^(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATOC,and[^(18)F]-fluoride.Following COVID-19 mass vaccination,a significant percentage of patients examined by 2-[^(18)F]FDG PET/CT presents axillary,reactive lymph node uptake.Anamnesis,low-dose CT,and ultrasonography facilitated correct diagnosis.Semi-quantitative assessment supported the visual analysis of PET/CT data;SUVmax values of metastatic lymph nodes were considerably higher than post-vaccine lymph nodes.[^(18)F]Choline uptake in reactive lymph node after vaccination was confirmed.After the COVID-19 pandemic,nuclear physicians need to take these potential false positive cases into account in daily clinical practice.
基金
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the“Mariano Santo”Hospital in Cosenza,Italy(CS391273).
