期刊文献+

航运联盟协议反垄断的制度构建及立法建议 被引量:1

Rules Construction and Legislative Suggestions of Anti-Monopoly of Shipping Alliance Agreement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 航运联盟协议是国际班轮运输经营者在全球范围内达成的商业协议,在国际班轮运输市场中产生双重的竞争效果。通过总结正在运营的联盟协议内容,对航运联盟垄断风险进行评析。运用行为法经济学原理,诠释航运联盟协议达成共谋的历史基础和潜在风险,结合航运联盟企业合营的法律性质和国际航运业的特殊性,论证中国应当从规制和豁免两方面构建航运联盟协议反垄断制度的必要性和合理性。进而,对比欧盟、美国和中国的国际航运反垄断制度及立法动态,结合国际航运反垄断立法经验,提出中国应当加快构建航运反垄断法律制度的具体立法条文建议。 The agreement of shipping alliance is the commercial agreement concluded by international liner shipping operators on a global scale,which brings dual competition effects in international liner shipping market.This essay analyses the contents of the alliance agreements in operation to analyze shipping alliance monopoly risks.Anti-monopoly theory of behavioral economics is introduced to interpret the historical basis and potential risks of collusion in shipping alliance agreement and further demonstrate the necessity and rationality for China to establish anti-monopoly of shipping alliance agreement regulations from the perspective of regulating and exemption by combing the legal nature of joint venture of shipping alliance and the particularity of international shipping industry.Moreover,specific legislative provisions should be proposed by contrasting the anti-monopoly regulations of shipping alliance and the recent developments in the European Union,the United States and China and combing the international shipping antitrust legislation experience.
作者 林子樱 LIN Ziying(School of Law,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116081,China)
出处 《中国海商法研究》 2023年第2期81-93,共13页 Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
基金 2022年度交通运输部水运科学研究所委托课题“集装箱海运领域反垄断豁免制度”。
关键词 航运联盟 共谋 行为反垄断 反垄断豁免制度 shipping alliance collusion behavioral antitrust anti-monopoly exemption regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1伍再阳.联营应如何分类[J].现代法学,1988,10(3):24-27. 被引量:1
  • 2孙勇志.国际航运联营体经营模式比较研究[J].青岛远洋船员学院学报,2004,25(4):35-39. 被引量:7
  • 3项晓晓.欧盟竞争法对企业合营的规制[J].时代经贸(下旬),2007(01Z):36-37. 被引量:1
  • 4美国律师协会反垄断分会:《企业合营-竞争者之间合作行为的反垄断分析》,孟雁北、李然译,北京大学出版社2011年版,第5页.
  • 5Gregory J. Werden, Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures.. An Overview, 66 Antitrust L.J. 701, 1998, P701-702(1998).
  • 6Joseph F. Brodley, Joint Ventures and Antitrust Policy, 95 Harv. L. Rev. 1982, p1521-1526.
  • 7Council Regulation (EEC) No 1310/97 amending Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, Official Journal L 180, 1997 pl-6.
  • 8Timken Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 1951, p593.
  • 9Martin B. Louis, Restraints Ancillary to Joint Ventures and Licensing Agreements: Do Sealy and Topco Logically Survive Sylvania and Broadcast Music, 66 Virginia Law Review 879, 1980,p882-883.
  • 10United States v. Penn-Olin Co., 378 U.S. 1964, p176-177(1964).

共引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部