基于新发展理念的省域建设用地利用模式评判与分类

Judgment and Classification of Construction Land Utilization Mode at the Provincial Level Based on New Development Concept

基于新发展理念构建了判定区域建设用地利用模式分析框架,用全排列多边形图示法,测算了各研究单元创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享五大子系统发展指数与高质量发展指数;用加权分解法得到了建设用地五大效益值和效益指数;再用比值法和排列组合法构建了建设用地利用模式的评判标准;借此判定了中国内地各省域建设用地利用模式。结果表明:(1)2019年中国五大子系统的平均水平由高到低依次为协调、绿色、共享、开放、创新发展;建设用地五大效益的平均值由高到低依次为协调、绿色、共享、开放、创新效益。(2)建设用地利用模式分为五大类:4个高质量利用型(北京、上海、福建和浙江)、2个一维滞后利用型(江苏和广东)、3个二维滞后利用型(天津、重庆和陕西)、7个四维滞后利用型(山东、山西、河南、广西、四川、贵州和宁夏)和15个低质量利用型。(3)有27个省域建设用地为非高质量利用型,占内地省域总数的87.10%。对不同模式的省域,从创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享5个维度制定差别化的提效对策。

Promoting Chinese modernization through high-quality use of construction land,based on the new development concept,the analysis framework for determining the regional construction land utilization pattern is constructed.The development index of innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing,and the high-quality development index of each research unit are calculated by using the full arrangement polygon graphic method.It uses the weighted decomposition method to obtain the five benefit values and benefit indexes of construction land,the ratio method and the permutation and combination method to construct the evaluation criteria of the construction land use model.Based on the above,it determines the construction land utilization mode.The results show that:1)In 2019,the average levels of the five subsystems in China were coordination,green,sharing,openness,and innovation in descending order.The benefit average levels of five subsystems of construction land were coordination,green,sharing,openness,and innovation in descending order.2)The utilization mode of construction land in China can be divided into five categories,including four high-quality utilization types(Beijing,Shanghai,Fujian and Zhejiang),two one-dimensional lagging-type utilization type(Jiangsu and Guangdong),and three two-dimensional lagging-type utilization types(Tianjin,Chongqing and Shaanxi),seven four-dimensional lagging-type utilization types(Shandong,Shanxi,Henan,Guangxi,Sichuan,Guizhou and Ningxia)and fifteen low-quality utilization types.3)There are 27 non-high-quality utilization research units in China,accounting for 87.10%of the total number of research units.For research units of different model,differentiated and effective countermeasures are formulated from five dimensions:innovation,coordination,greenness,openness and sharing.