期刊文献+

腹腔镜Keyhole修补术和Sugarbaker修补术治疗末端结肠造口旁疝的比较研究

Comparative study of laparoscopic Keyhole and Sugarbaker technique in the treatment of terminal paracolostomy hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜Keyhole修补术与腹腔镜Sugarbaker修补术治疗结肠造口旁疝的效果。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年12月中国科学技术大学附属第一医院疝及减重代谢外科连续收治的因造口旁疝接受腹腔镜下修补的117例患者资料,男性45例,女性72例,年龄(68.6±8.6)岁(范围:44~84岁)。按修补技术分为Sugarbaker组(89例)和Keyhole组(28例)。采用t检验、Mann-WhitneyU检验、χ^(2)检验或Fisher确切概率法比较两组的手术时间、手术相关并发症发生率、术后复发率等数据。结果全部患者随访时间[M(IQR)]为33(36)个月(范围:12~84个月)。与Sugarbaker组相比,Keyhole组疝环面积更大[35(26)cm^(2)比25(16)cm^(2),Z=1.974,P=0.048],住院时间更长[(22.0±8.0)d比(14.1±6.2)d,t=5.485,P<0.01],术后复发率更高[28.6%(8/28)比6.7%(6/89),χ^(2)=7.675,P=0.006]。两组术后并发症发生率无差异(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜下使用非立体的防粘连补片修补造口旁疝,Sugarbaker修补术的复发率低于Keyhole修补术,但两组术后并发症发生率无差异。 Objective To compare laparoscopic Keyhole repair with Sugarbaker repair in consecutive patients with parastomal hernia.Methods From January 2015 to December 2021,117 patients with parastomal hernia were treated with Keyhole or Sugarbaker laparoscopy repairs in the Department of Hernia and Bariatrci Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China,and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.There were 45 males and 72 females,aged(68.6±8.6)years(range:44 to 84 years).Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair was performed in 89 cases,and Keyhole repair was performed in 28 cases.The t-test,Mann-Whitney U test,χ^(2)test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the observation indicators between the two groups,such as operation time,incidence of operation-related complications,and postoperative recurrence rate.Results The follow-up period was(M(IQR))33(36)months(range:12 to 84 months).Compared to the Sugarbaker group,the hernia ring area of the Keyhole group was bigger(35(26)cm^(2)vs.25(16)cm^(2),Z=1.974,P=0.048),length of stay was longer((22.0±8.0)d vs.(14.1±6.2)d,t=5.485,P<0.01),and the postoperative rate of recurrence was higher(28.6%(8/28)vs.6.7%(6/89),χ^(2)=7.675,P=0.006).There was no difference in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups.Conclusions Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair is superior to Keyhole repair in the recurrence rate of parastomal hernia treated with compsite mesh(not funnel-shaped mesh).There are no differences in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups.
作者 吴立胜 潘晨 余建伟 李煜 Wu Lisheng;Pan Chen;Yu Jianwei;Li Yu(Department of Hernia and Bariatrci Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230001,China)
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第6期503-506,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(WK2340000111)。
关键词 腹部 腹腔镜检查 造口旁疝 修复外科手术 Hernia,abdominal Laparoscopy Parastomal hernia Reconstructive surgical procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br JSurg 2003; 90: 784-793 [PMID: 12854101].
  • 2Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88:113-25, ix [PMID: 18267165 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.003].
  • 3Craft RO, Huguet KL, McLemore EC, Harold KL. Laparoscopicparastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2008; 12: 137-140 [PMID:17999128].
  • 4Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life tableanalysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis ColonRectum 1994; 37: 916-920 [PMID: 8076492].
  • 5López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, Sánchez JL,Vallribera F, Martí M, Jiménez LM, Armengol-Carrasco M, EspínE. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia duringlaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlledtrial. Hernia 2012; 16: 661-667 [PMID: 22782367 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0952-z].
  • 6Ripoche J, Basurko C, Fabbro-Perray P, Prudhomme M.Parastomal hernia. A study of the French federation of ostomypatients. J Visc Surg 2011; 148: e435-e441 [PMID: 22130074 DOI:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.10.006].
  • 7Rosin JD, Bonardi RA. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlexmesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1977; 20: 299-302[PMID: 862490].
  • 8Ogata S, Hongo M. Bacteriophages of the genus Clostridium. AdvAppl Microbiol 1979; 25: 241-273 [PMID: 397738].
  • 9LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE, Whitaker JM, Hausmann MG.Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2005; 9: 140-144[PMID: 15602627].
  • 10Hansson BM, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP. Laparoscopicparastomal hernia repair is feasible and safe: early results of aprospective clinical study including 55 consecutive patients. SurgEndosc 2007; 21: 989-993 [PMID: 17353985].

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部